Don't worry London, the media are on the case.
bounder not here that often,
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 13:51,
archived)
...and then go ahead and use it anyway, despite permission being explicitly refused
Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 14:12,
archived)
the permission being sort is to use imagesrather than embed tweet (with images in)
Generally prefer the first but will settle for second and second doesn't need permission.
(Generally prefer the first but will settle for second and second doesn't need permission.
rob,
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 14:28,
archived)
Generally embedding Tweets is easier and seen as journalism these days anyway. Put a headline, mis-spell something, embed tweets work done!
Say "Twitter has reacted" - not meaning the company, just seeing its users as a homogeneous group, for extra journalism points.
(,
Sat 16 Sep 2017, 23:32,
archived)
Say "Twitter has reacted" - not meaning the company, just seeing its users as a homogeneous group, for extra journalism points.
it just got massive!
(
lustreboy making himself laugh since 1973 (tm),
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 14:27,
archived)
and then went small again
(
lustreboy making himself laugh since 1973 (tm),
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 14:27,
archived)
I'm clearly losing it
(
lustreboy making himself laugh since 1973 (tm),
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 14:27,
archived)
magic donkey just approved it for the front page and fannied it up a bit temporarily
( rob,
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 14:29,
archived)
good old fannying :)
(
lustreboy making himself laugh since 1973 (tm),
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 14:29,
archived)
Hahaha*cries inside*
Really, if journalism consists of checking twitter and asking for permission to use images, at least give everyone in the world a decent camera.
(Really, if journalism consists of checking twitter and asking for permission to use images, at least give everyone in the world a decent camera.
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Fri 15 Sep 2017, 15:02,
archived)