Maybe cunning combinations of spam mail will work!
There's no such thing as a get rich quick scheme, we all know that. But maybe, just maybe if you combine the right combination of things.....
From the Get Rich Quick challenge. See all 176 entries (closed)
( , Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:00, archived)
There's no such thing as a get rich quick scheme, we all know that. But maybe, just maybe if you combine the right combination of things.....
From the Get Rich Quick challenge. See all 176 entries (closed)
( , Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:00, archived)
Sorry
Only my third attempt at posting a piccy here. The others started off smaller, I didn't realise this one was going to come out so big!!
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:02,
archived)
No worries ...
Just click the *edit* button and add "width=300" into the URL part.
There's also a handy 'preview' button so you can see what things'll look like before you post.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:06,
archived)
There's also a handy 'preview' button so you can see what things'll look like before you post.
Well I made it smaller
Not sure where you mean by putting the width=300 into the URL. I'll experiment later maybe. It's hometime now so I'm off.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:10,
archived)
Making it smaller is always the best thing
(file size is smaller for dial-upers).
The 'width thing' is just changing from this:
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" />
to
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" width=xxx />
EDIT: Okay, it's not in the URL (that was misleading) it's in the link/anchor.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:14,
archived)
The 'width thing' is just changing from this:
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" />
to
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" width=xxx />
EDIT: Okay, it's not in the URL (that was misleading) it's in the link/anchor.
Nah
That just made it unreadable. I'll stick with just making the original image smaller and posting that instead, like what I already done.
Next time I'll make sure the image I make is a more useable size!
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:19,
archived)
Next time I'll make sure the image I make is a more useable size!
Oh doing what you did was the better option ...
Using "width=" is just a quick hack :)
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:29,
archived)
Mmm, can't quite read that
Why not make it bigger!
EDIT: But to be fair, it's a rather amusing post, just a tad on the big side.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:01,
archived)
EDIT: But to be fair, it's a rather amusing post, just a tad on the big side.
TJ: Anyone still
listening to Resonance radio any more? Who are these 2 tosspots?
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:05,
archived)
Big cock
I got one of those penis expansion emails today, it said "increase your penis size up to two inches".
I was well chuffed - mine's bigger than that already.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:09,
archived)
I was well chuffed - mine's bigger than that already.
Could you please make that bigger?
no, honestly, I've got a really large hi-resolution monitor and it takes up just under half the screen and I find the text hard to read...
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:14,
archived)
I want one of these
www.viewsonic.com/products/lcd_vp2290b.htm
3840x2400 pixels. Should be enough.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:19,
archived)
3840x2400 pixels. Should be enough.