I just tried to go on that circuit bending site again...
we killed their bandwidth limit... they're not too happy about it either...
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:37,
archived)
i can't believe they've said 'thanks alot b3ta' in a narky way
ffs! do these people crave obscurity?
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:54,
archived)
they probably just don't crave a whopping bill.
crazy mo fo's!
oh.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:55,
archived)
oh.
hahah
*chuffed
what are they talking about anyway? what is this site?
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:39,
archived)
what are they talking about anyway? what is this site?
aw...
they've taken off the 'voices from hell' sound clip
/sulk
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:43,
archived)
/sulk
quite
I quite like the idea ... but the results were fucking horrible ... it can't be impossible to be both competent at analogue electronics and not tone deaf, surely?
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:44,
archived)
a great idea,
requiring a bit more tweaking... and some musicality.
Though a plus point is that It all sounds like John cage/Stockhausen/Varese et al.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:47,
archived)
Though a plus point is that It all sounds like John cage/Stockhausen/Varese et al.
I like your definition
of a "plus point"
I saw an air concert recently where an engineer came on between a couple of the songs and fucked about with the wires in the back of an old electric organ ... bit of an affectation but quite amusing)
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:52,
archived)
I saw an air concert recently where an engineer came on between a couple of the songs and fucked about with the wires in the back of an old electric organ ... bit of an affectation but quite amusing)
A possible plus point then.
liking radiohead + wannabe musician + art school = Lover of all things pretentious.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:57,
archived)
I don't understand.
Usually people like getting webhits. What did you guys do?
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:41,
archived)
people went on it
too much, and now they have exceeded their bandwidth limit
suckers
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:42,
archived)
suckers
Well when 70,000 people get a newsletter
they generally have a look at the links. Thing is they all get it at the same time, so either: a) they server takes a dive because it can't handle the traffic or b) there bandwidth limit is exceeded in about 5 minutes. This time it was the latter.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:44,
archived)
It ought to be good for business
though. The more people that know the better, surely.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:46,
archived)
Maybe
But were the actually selling anything? If not it is going to whack there wallet quite hard.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:46,
archived)
exactly. It's very unfortunate
but a total pisser for them. I don't really see why it's that funny...
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:51,
archived)
the fact that their site's down isn't funny, i've had it happen to me too and it sucks...
the fact that they thank us in a sarcastic way trying to make us look bad is the funny part.
well, it is to me anyway.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:55,
archived)
well, it is to me anyway.
is there a policy
on asking people if they mind their site going in the newsletter?
or at least warning them in case they have dodgy hosts who'll burn their credit cards?
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:57,
archived)
or at least warning them in case they have dodgy hosts who'll burn their credit cards?
They are selling
some bent machines and some unbent ones, I Initially thought that this was the primary purpose of the site-But it's obviously more of a hobby site.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:52,
archived)
hahaha
First we exceed their bandwidth limit, now someone puts a link to the bandwidth exceeded message on a very popular messageboard.... ;)
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:44,
archived)
i hoped someone would get the irony...
i just wanted to wind them up a bit more for trying to make us look bad.
yeah.
( ,
Tue 20 Apr 2004, 11:46,
archived)
yeah.