
Don't you know that "most inmates are fed better at Guantanamo than at home"
Why, even the children they had locked away there got to eat McDonald's once or twice.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:09,
archived)
Why, even the children they had locked away there got to eat McDonald's once or twice.

Pretty much all of them gained weight.
But don't let troublesome facts get in the way of your little hate-America festival.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:13,
archived)
But don't let troublesome facts get in the way of your little hate-America festival.

in your tiny little mind.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:24,
archived)

people who try to stop terrorism and dictatorship are worse than actual terrorists and dictators.
Your ethical values are totally inverted.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:29,
archived)
Your ethical values are totally inverted.

I have the luxury of you inverting them on my behalf... but thanks for playing.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:30,
archived)

of doing your best to mock the system that feeds, houses and protects you, while leaving the real criminals, mass murderers and torturers of the world unmolested by your sneers. And you can only do that because you live in a democratic country.
Yet you despise that democracy rather than those who are trying to destroy it. Your activities are a waste.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:35,
archived)
Yet you despise that democracy rather than those who are trying to destroy it. Your activities are a waste.

I love democracy... I mock and oppose all those who would destroy or weaken it.
And that goes for you, too, Mr Shouty Pants.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:42,
archived)
And that goes for you, too, Mr Shouty Pants.

If Bush or Blair are less than perfect, you think they're Hitler.
You're weakening democracy with your distortions.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:45,
archived)
You're weakening democracy with your distortions.

into my mouth... they taste like sewage for some reason.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:50,
archived)

complete with special face-breaking frat boy signet rings
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 14:56,
archived)

You have to be a terrorist to get in.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 14:56,
archived)

I got the impression they were pretty flexible on that rule. Well, on most rules to be honest.
edit: Gosh, hasn't it gone quiet?
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 14:58,
archived)
edit: Gosh, hasn't it gone quiet?

based as they are on left-wing propaganda, have little relation to reality.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:08,
archived)

that every inmate in Gunatanamo is a terrist. I'd be interested in seeing your proof.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:10,
archived)

I have the presumption of innocence on my side. Show me your proof of guilt.
Here's a clue: You can start by looking through the records of the trials these men have been given.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:14,
archived)
Here's a clue: You can start by looking through the records of the trials these men have been given.

but that doesn't stop you and Bo'bo'bo'obo'bo'dor and others caling him a criminal.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:18,
archived)

he has to put up with people using word-like-things against his use of bombs, napalm, torture and detention without trial. There's no justice.
I know you must be feeling left out, what with having no banner and all... so I made this just for you:

( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:23,
archived)
I know you must be feeling left out, what with having no banner and all... so I made this just for you:


and instead of citing facts you can only make stupid jokes.
www.b3ta.com/board/5164747
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:25,
archived)
www.b3ta.com/board/5164747

I have the presumption of innocence on my side. Show me your proof of guilt.
Here's a clue: You can start by looking through the records of the trials these men have been given.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:28,
archived)
Here's a clue: You can start by looking through the records of the trials these men have been given.

And being captured while fighting out of uniform doesn't even entitle someone to be a prisoner of war. It entitles them to be summarily sentenced by a military tribunal and executed on the spot.
Guantanamo inmates actually get better treatment than what they are entitled to receive under international law.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:31,
archived)
Guantanamo inmates actually get better treatment than what they are entitled to receive under international law.

They gained weight and all.
You claim they're all guilty. Show me your proof of guilt.
PS - Unlawful combatants don't get trials... that's what you meant to say, isn't it?
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:36,
archived)
You claim they're all guilty. Show me your proof of guilt.
PS - Unlawful combatants don't get trials... that's what you meant to say, isn't it?

and you know it, which is why you've chosen this line of attack. But the rules of civil law don't apply in this case anyway.
Actually prisoners of war don't get trials. Being captured while wearing an enemy uniform is considered sufficient to imprison someone for the duration of the war.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:40,
archived)
Actually prisoners of war don't get trials. Being captured while wearing an enemy uniform is considered sufficient to imprison someone for the duration of the war.

does this mean that my impressions,
based as they are on left-wing propaganda, have some relation to reality?
And I didn't choose a line of attack. You made an assertion that you could not prove, and I called you on it. You ducked you dived, but at last (and this is rare for you) you had to admit that You. Were. Wrong... before swiftly pointing out that those rules don't apply in this game, rubber/glue no returns nyer-nyer-nyer.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:46,
archived)
based as they are on left-wing propaganda, have some relation to reality?
And I didn't choose a line of attack. You made an assertion that you could not prove, and I called you on it. You ducked you dived, but at last (and this is rare for you) you had to admit that You. Were. Wrong... before swiftly pointing out that those rules don't apply in this game, rubber/glue no returns nyer-nyer-nyer.

...for enemy combatants not to wear uniform, but CIA operatives in the field are allowed to?
Or if caught should they be summarily sentenced by military tribunal and executed on the spot?
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:44,
archived)
Or if caught should they be summarily sentenced by military tribunal and executed on the spot?

Then again, one might not.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:48,
archived)

it seems like those with the biggest guns make the rules and those with the biggest guns can break the rules, but woe betide anybody else who trys.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:50,
archived)

Don't try to dodge the question. How can you be so sure they're all terrorists, every last one of them, if they've never got a trial?
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 16:48,
archived)

Here he goes again.
Did you ever think that maybe its not always "leftist thoughts" and that oh, I dont know, maybe your sometimes WRONG ABOUT STUFF.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:13,
archived)
Did you ever think that maybe its not always "leftist thoughts" and that oh, I dont know, maybe your sometimes WRONG ABOUT STUFF.

Here goes another unfunny left-wing political post on B3ta.
And isn't it terrible when people don't share your beliefs?
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:17,
archived)
And isn't it terrible when people don't share your beliefs?

www.b3ta.com/board/5164723
Instead of trying to force your beliefs on me.
And no, im not "left-wing". I dont vote. At all. Other than on forum-polls.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:18,
archived)
Instead of trying to force your beliefs on me.
And no, im not "left-wing". I dont vote. At all. Other than on forum-polls.

fantastic system
let`s all go!
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 14:58,
archived)
let`s all go!

release you with no charge ? (apart from much thinner)
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:03,
archived)

since most inmates are fed better at Guantanamo than at home.
And some who were released without charge went on to commit more terrorist acts.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:07,
archived)
And some who were released without charge went on to commit more terrorist acts.

But the BBC won't tell you such things because it doesn't fit their political agenda.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:11,
archived)

I'll believe you if you can link to something credible backing up that claim.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:12,
archived)

I'll let you choose for yourself from these 37,600 links.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:15,
archived)

I was more interested in the "some who were released without charge went on to commit more terrorist acts."
I'm perfectly prepared to believe that being under American jurisdiction can make people fat, that's not much of a stretch...
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:18,
archived)
I'm perfectly prepared to believe that being under American jurisdiction can make people fat, that's not much of a stretch...

but here's one report, since you probably won't regard this report as "credible" by your standards.
It would be unwise to assume that people are pure as the driven snow merely because they're being held by the evil US.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:24,
archived)
It would be unwise to assume that people are pure as the driven snow merely because they're being held by the evil US.

My insisting on a trial or doubting their level of guilt does not mean that I think they are whiter than white.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:27,
archived)

The first link didn't work for me, and yes, I'm somewhat unwilling to believe 100% what I read on foxnews.com, but let's assume it's true for now: surely, if the US releases suspected terrorists back into the world and they come back to fight again, that's a major intelligence failure on the part of the US administration in its job to protect it's citizens?
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:32,
archived)

-- but it's erring on the side of giving the prisoners more rights rather than less.
If the US heeded the demands of some that all Guantanamo inmates be released unless they were positively proven to be terrorists to jury-trial standards, it would only worsen that situation.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:37,
archived)
If the US heeded the demands of some that all Guantanamo inmates be released unless they were positively proven to be terrorists to jury-trial standards, it would only worsen that situation.

is helping us to win hearts and minds across the globe.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:39,
archived)

who is doing your level best to 'lose' as many hearts and minds across the globe as you possibly can.
All because your own side isn't as perfectly squeaky-clean as you'd like it to be -- even as you don't ever criticise the real mass murderers, torturers and tyrants we're fighting.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:44,
archived)
All because your own side isn't as perfectly squeaky-clean as you'd like it to be -- even as you don't ever criticise the real mass murderers, torturers and tyrants we're fighting.

Yes, I am unwittingly in league with the terrists. I should let a few more things slide, lest I provide fodder for recruitment videos.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:49,
archived)

I don't know my international human rights law well enough to continue this discussion, really.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:46,
archived)

Most of his arguements are based on what he learns from War Picture Library.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 15:52,
archived)

I really can't be bothered. I was just interested to see if there actually was some solid report saying something like "Muhammed Q. Jihaddist was released from Gitmo on Monday and blew the fuck out of Baghdad on Thursday", but of course it's just some GOP loudmouth on Fox saying the US admin is "too liberal" again. "Too liberal..." You couldn't make it up, no-one would believe you.
( ,
Mon 26 Sep 2005, 16:00,
archived)