
appologies if someones done this idea before, I'm a n00b...

( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:43,
archived)


I imagine it was in fact typed deliberately, so you're technically right.
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:48,
archived)

is an abbreviation of 'typographical error', would an apostrophe not be acceptable?


( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:49,
archived)



*bides time*
I knew I should have checked spelling before posting in a pedant post
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:55,
archived)
I knew I should have checked spelling before posting in a pedant post

Surely the apostrophe could be there to indicate that it is abbreviated...
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:53,
archived)

after all 'that's' is an abbreviation of 'that is'


( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:54,
archived)



the apostrophe indicates a missing letter in the body of a contraction.
'typo' has just had letters lopped off the end, in the same way that 'stereo' or 'radio' have, and hence doesn't merit one.
/geek
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:57,
archived)
'typo' has just had letters lopped off the end, in the same way that 'stereo' or 'radio' have, and hence doesn't merit one.
/geek

missing between words. For example, Im going t'pub
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:57,
archived)

I was just backing you up - as is this webpage:
Plural and Possessive Abbreviations
The formation of plurals and possessives is usually pretty straightforward, except in the case of abbreviations and acronyms. The following rules should help.
To form the plural of an abbreviation, a number, or a capital letter used as a noun, simply add an 's' to the end.
* A group of MPs
* The late 1940s
* Mind your Ps and Qs
To form the plural of an abbreviation with periods, a lowercase letter used as a noun, and abbreviations or capital letters that would be ambiguous or confusing if the 's' alone were added, use an apostrophe and an 's'.
* A group of M.P.'s (see note below)
* The x's in the equation
* Sending SOS's
Edit: I just reread that - and it kinda shows the other way is right...
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:58,
archived)
Plural and Possessive Abbreviations
The formation of plurals and possessives is usually pretty straightforward, except in the case of abbreviations and acronyms. The following rules should help.
To form the plural of an abbreviation, a number, or a capital letter used as a noun, simply add an 's' to the end.
* A group of MPs
* The late 1940s
* Mind your Ps and Qs
To form the plural of an abbreviation with periods, a lowercase letter used as a noun, and abbreviations or capital letters that would be ambiguous or confusing if the 's' alone were added, use an apostrophe and an 's'.
* A group of M.P.'s (see note below)
* The x's in the equation
* Sending SOS's
Edit: I just reread that - and it kinda shows the other way is right...

Not now that 'typo' is an accepted term in the English language.
/editorial boringness
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:52,
archived)
/editorial boringness

/boring question



the point is, it doesn't really matter, but we get a leetle bit of smug satisfaction pointing it out to others . . .


( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:04,
archived)



okay then...
reciept
deciet
riegn
wieght
hieght
blah blah blah!!!
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:05,
archived)
reciept
deciet
riegn
wieght
hieght
blah blah blah!!!

...forgets rest of rule, excpet after c, still, at least two of these were valid!
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:07,
archived)

Learning shitty pedantic rules is no substitute for actually learning how to spell words. Not that it matters that much anyway nowadays. The only reason we have such crazy spelling in English is to stop Johnny Foreigner (oh look, there's another one) from learning it in a couple of months.
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:11,
archived)

...particular credit should be given to the old gent who invented so many ways to pronounce the letters "...ough". That'll confuse those darn foreign types!
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:13,
archived)

But it doesn't matter if it's unofficial if everyone knows what you mean.
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:58,
archived)

is too. So it goes either way, really.
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:55,
archived)

but it's a bit cliched so I can understand your suspicion, will try harder next time...
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:52,
archived)

but then I saw on your profile that it is your website
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:54,
archived)

altervistas is a site cataloging pictures and stuff etc,
is this one of the catalogued entries, or an original?
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:53,
archived)
is this one of the catalogued entries, or an original?

I run the site with a friend of mine. I will endevour to be more original and smite those who doubt me......
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 12:56,
archived)

we`re usually a bit suspicious here, especially of new users, as we get a fair amount of trolls nicking "funny" pics we`ve seen a hundred times - don`t take it personally!
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:05,
archived)

...If busy. Quite coincidental that you should show up on the board. Where are you located in the country now?
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:03,
archived)

still in bournemouth, don't see much of the old gang. how about you?
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:07,
archived)

I still see quite a few of them from Uni-- my GF started at Bournemouth Uni yesterday as a fresher actually. Just came back from Shark diving in South Africa and did a Abseil from 1100M off table top mountain. Unfortunately though I injured myself falling out of a bunk bed after 24 Jack Daniels. Perhaps we should hook up at some point. I still have the same number and can always be located ;-)
( ,
Tue 27 Sep 2005, 13:10,
archived)