hey baby
been busy with me new job - one of those jobs where you work from the minute you arrive until the minute you leave (but still get a full lunch break!), and our bandwidth is rubbish and monitored heavily, so I`ll not be around during weekdays until such times as I leave the place or have a holiday
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:47,
archived)
been busy with me new job - one of those jobs where you work from the minute you arrive until the minute you leave (but still get a full lunch break!), and our bandwidth is rubbish and monitored heavily, so I`ll not be around during weekdays until such times as I leave the place or have a holiday
did you see my entry for 'accidentally erotic'?
it's in me profile....
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:52,
archived)
it's in me profile....
(, Sun 12 Feb 2006, 22:06, archived)
charming!
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 22:12,
archived)
so far so good.. it`s hectic to say the least, but there`s a lot of Unix geekdom, so it`ll be interesting if not fun
.. it`s when I go on 24 hour call things might get a bit shit!
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:54,
archived)
.. it`s when I go on 24 hour call things might get a bit shit!
you should write a script that occasionally inserts a reply that says *bums* on the day board, so we feel more at home here ;)
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:57,
archived)
but I`d have to make sure the code parsed the board and only posted as a reply to an existing thread ;)
crontab here we come!
edit: as for getting well-paid... well, I`ll let you know when I can get to the end of the month without being broke after paying the bills :(
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:58,
archived)
crontab here we come!
edit: as for getting well-paid... well, I`ll let you know when I can get to the end of the month without being broke after paying the bills :(
it`ll be posting throughout the day, and you`ll never even know if it`s really me ;)
/strikes fear into teh board
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 22:04,
archived)
/strikes fear into teh board
a Beatles song lyric?
*plays funky bass-line like what The Jam nicked for "Start" *
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:46,
archived)
*plays funky bass-line like what The Jam nicked for "Start" *
ccc did a fantastic beatles / jam mashup on his Revolved "album" - if you can track that down by hook or by crook, it`s well recommended
lots of Beatles music / singing with different bands` vocals or music - very clever stuff
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:48,
archived)
lots of Beatles music / singing with different bands` vocals or music - very clever stuff
takes better pictures than my crap camera phone.
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:43,
archived)
I like the colour of your nail varnish.
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:59,
archived)
and on a different note entirely:
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4707354.stm
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:43,
archived)
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4707354.stm
that makes even me get annoyed at RPS from time to time. Honestly, there's no need.
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:44,
archived)
so I sent him a photo of my arse
.. just to save you lot from seeing it
I suppose it was the equivalent of squeezing a stress ball or something (the act, not the arse)
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:45,
archived)
.. just to save you lot from seeing it
I suppose it was the equivalent of squeezing a stress ball or something (the act, not the arse)
he had to see your arse.
But yeah, it makes sense, and I understand why people have a problem with RPS/violation of guidelines/general inconsiderate posting
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:53,
archived)
But yeah, it makes sense, and I understand why people have a problem with RPS/violation of guidelines/general inconsiderate posting
I don't think people would have as much of a problem with RPS if the photos posted were in the same thread so not as to knock other stuff off the board, interesting to look at, and generally not something like a picture of one's foot.
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:51,
archived)
that are well done, and properly optimised. Same as for shopped images. But people see it as an excuse to post any old crap - it's the equivalent of if someone decided "Oh, lets make today 30 second paintmash Sunday"
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 21:59,
archived)
that's at least a 5 minute paintmash though
oooh, can I ask you a geeky question?
What html code do I need to make "image a" appear in Firefox/Opera, and "image b" appear in IE?
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 22:03,
archived)
oooh, can I ask you a geeky question?
What html code do I need to make "image a" appear in Firefox/Opera, and "image b" appear in IE?
you need to identify the browser accessing the page hosting the image; this can be done with server side code and testing the HTTP user agent, or by client side code (JavaScript)
the javascript route may be easiest and is probably the more dependable way of doing things
have a squizz here for browser detection scripts
you can test what the browser SAYS it is (some browsers can spoof and pretend to be others) using app.name or test things like the DOM (document object model) properties - these are implemented differently between browsers)
you can then use an if..then..else constuct to document.write the correct code to the page depending on your if..then (assuming javascript is actually turned on)
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 22:10,
archived)
the javascript route may be easiest and is probably the more dependable way of doing things
have a squizz here for browser detection scripts
you can test what the browser SAYS it is (some browsers can spoof and pretend to be others) using app.name or test things like the DOM (document object model) properties - these are implemented differently between browsers)
you can then use an if..then..else constuct to document.write the correct code to the page depending on your if..then (assuming javascript is actually turned on)
you can`t really do it if e.g. the image was going to be posted here
in that case you`d need to <img src="...."> to a script on your server that generates / returns the image, and then you`d need to depend on the user agent being OK
(,
Sun 12 Feb 2006, 22:19,
archived)
in that case you`d need to <img src="...."> to a script on your server that generates / returns the image, and then you`d need to depend on the user agent being OK



