

make yer own!
Will linky if offensive

Your Twin Towers got high marks at my work yesterday. Good job!
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 20:54,
archived)

FAN-tastic! Yeah, I didn't know how people would react, bt response was favorable.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 20:59,
archived)

one thing I love about b3ta above all else is the subtlety with which the jokes are presented.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 20:59,
archived)

when you say 'Hello love/pretty/dave/darling.' before doing her roughly up the wrong 'un instead of diving straight in there.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:06,
archived)

well THAT'S no fun...
no screaming?
no anal fissure bleeding?
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:08,
archived)
no screaming?
no anal fissure bleeding?

Just as much, and you even get to see the shocked look on their face before the entry of the spam-javelin... it's brilliant! And it's subtle, mmm.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:14,
archived)

cuz he mixes it with love and makes the HURT feel good!
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:09,
archived)

sort of... I'm afraid I'm not nerd enough to totally get it, so it's a bit RIS.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 20:58,
archived)

He will report your IP address to WP:ABUSE, then you'll be sorry.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:04,
archived)

▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:05,
archived)
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒
▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:06,
archived)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:07,
archived)

now please inform me of the meaning of this Wikipedia thing? Is this Sith Lord dork banning RAND for something?
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:08,
archived)

Yes. Probably for writing "Daz Sampson is an accomplished paedofile". Which he is.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:14,
archived)

you see? That wasn't so difficult.
You get a Gold Star!
*bums*
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:16,
archived)
You get a Gold Star!
*bums*

Bills itself as a free 'encyclopedia'. The founding principle is that literally anyone can edit any article.
This does of course mean that wikipedia is not so much fact, as popular opinion. Expert knowledge is modded down by the likes of our friend 'the dark lord of the sith' who will most likely never know the touch of a woman.
I am not Andrew Orlowski, and you may not claim £5.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:30,
archived)
This does of course mean that wikipedia is not so much fact, as popular opinion. Expert knowledge is modded down by the likes of our friend 'the dark lord of the sith' who will most likely never know the touch of a woman.
I am not Andrew Orlowski, and you may not claim £5.

in a very bad comprehensive under special measures
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:34,
archived)

in a very bad comprehensive under special measures
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:36,
archived)

or
The founding principles *are* . . .
Wikipedia rocks, but there will always be plenty
of English cunts ready to trash it because that's
what English cunts do, they trash everything.

because only people from england are bad, everyone else in the world is great...
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:51,
archived)

everything. Don't start whining because someone
takes the piss out of you.
The only thing worse than an Englishman who hates
everything is an Englishman who takes himself too
seriously.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:04,
archived)
takes the piss out of you.
The only thing worse than an Englishman who hates
everything is an Englishman who takes himself too
seriously.

awww bless
you really think I've overcome with hatred and despair at that statement
actually I don't start whining when people take the piss out of me, I can take it back. And I'm certain I don't take myself seriously, but clearly you need to, otherwise you wouldn't have made the comment.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:11,
archived)
you really think I've overcome with hatred and despair at that statement
actually I don't start whining when people take the piss out of me, I can take it back. And I'm certain I don't take myself seriously, but clearly you need to, otherwise you wouldn't have made the comment.

you weren't whining, you were just, uhm, being
funny, no that's not it. Whatever it was, was
much too subtle for my simple mind.
I'm a bit confused. You don't take yourself seriously
but clearly I need to?

If such were needed, that Wikipedia is a complete pile of bollocks.
Anyone else fancy a campaign of adding RAND's edits back onto the page repeatedly?
EDIT: Just put it back.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:21,
archived)
Anyone else fancy a campaign of adding RAND's edits back onto the page repeatedly?
EDIT: Just put it back.

it was a fun invasion, wasn't it
:D
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:30,
archived)
:D

It's been modded back.
Time to add it again.
Hey, I've got no plans tonight. :)
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:31,
archived)
Time to add it again.
Hey, I've got no plans tonight. :)

how did that slip through?
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:34,
archived)

ahh bless
sadly nobody really gives a shit in the long run
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:38,
archived)
sadly nobody really gives a shit in the long run

The editors are saying it's vandalism to say Daz looks like Huntley, but have said nothing about saying that Huntley resembles and based his life on Daz Sampson...
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:58,
archived)

"Please do not add offensive nonsense to articles, as you did to Daz Sampson. Thank you. TomPhil 20:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)"
Ooopsy.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:33,
archived)
Ooopsy.

rumbled!
they'll probably lock the article, due to abuse
hahaha :D
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:37,
archived)
they'll probably lock the article, due to abuse
hahaha :D

it's like a vigorous orgy of flids trying to reach for toothpaste on the top shelf or something
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:46,
archived)

but I'm sure someone else could do it quicker and better and more vigorously fliddy
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:52,
archived)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daz_Sampson
edit:someone changed it back, so i made it extra hard.
edit2:blasted all, they caught me, sorry Rand, i tried :)
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:44,
archived)
edit:someone changed it back, so i made it extra hard.
edit2:blasted all, they caught me, sorry Rand, i tried :)

You beat me to it...
Just as I'd put in a new proxy so they won't block my IP...
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:49,
archived)
Just as I'd put in a new proxy so they won't block my IP...

you know, you do realise that you are all fighting over daz sampson
in a way, that means, he's won!
hahahaha :D
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:56,
archived)
in a way, that means, he's won!
hahahaha :D

there had to be at least one person somewhere in the english speaking world that wanted to learn about Daz Sampson, and for a brief second in glorious history saw that he may, or may not be, an accomplished paedofile.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:59,
archived)

to look up to.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 22:00,
archived)

after twenty years of intermittently hearing "tasteless" baby jokes (etc), I find them a bit pointless. Still, no reason for teenagers not to like them.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:02,
archived)

I buy you one of those collars to put on your neck to stop you from scratching?
Maybe you need it on your cock instead. Where's the problem?
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:29,
archived)
Maybe you need it on your cock instead. Where's the problem?

typing skills, were they well practised before hand? Or before lack of hand, rather.
( ,
Fri 11 Aug 2006, 21:42,
archived)