
at least that won't get nicked by nuts.. it's too clever for their readership
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 12:00,
archived)

but I got more distracted by this whilst I was trying to read the BBC's story.
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6424937.stm
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 12:05,
archived)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6424937.stm

I heard about that on the radio this morning.
"If they didn't keep taking our children away we'd stop having them"
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 12:10,
archived)
"If they didn't keep taking our children away we'd stop having them"

I wonder if their children are all weird looking?
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 12:17,
archived)

Has the ring of a hyped-up scare about it, and putting a figure on something unquantifiable.
There is an increased chance of recessive genes matching ... something to do with alleles ... but recessive genes aren't necessarily harmful, and the risks involved in siblings breeding are smaller in the first generation.
( ,
Wed 7 Mar 2007, 12:41,
archived)
There is an increased chance of recessive genes matching ... something to do with alleles ... but recessive genes aren't necessarily harmful, and the risks involved in siblings breeding are smaller in the first generation.