![Challenge Entry: New Top Trumps [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

The game does drag on a bit...
From the New Top Trumps challenge. See all 206 entries (closed)
( , Thu 10 May 2007, 13:48, archived)

it wasn't jack sprat!!
it was the knave of hearts!!!
(jack sprat could eat no meat, his wife could eat no lean, she died malnourished and he re-married a photographer /jasper fforde blog)
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:55,
archived)
it was the knave of hearts!!!
(jack sprat could eat no meat, his wife could eat no lean, she died malnourished and he re-married a photographer /jasper fforde blog)

i didn't even look at the answers when i made it
plus i don't think the correct answer is even on there
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:56,
archived)
plus i don't think the correct answer is even on there

but it doesn't spoil the animation, just thought i'd point it out ;)
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 14:31,
archived)

although I'd put them all at zero,
given their complete non-existence and all.
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:50,
archived)
given their complete non-existence and all.

how else could there be pictures of them?
(obviously muhammed doesn't though)
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:53,
archived)
(obviously muhammed doesn't though)

There is only one true God, and it is called 'Frp'. It lives in a teapot in a garden shed in Kettering and is responsible for the materialisation of half-chewed fish heads in bin bags from households that don't eat fish.
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:54,
archived)

There should also be a card for the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:56,
archived)

I would know what cards you've got immediately just through what cards I've got. I used to play it by myself, with a dummy hand just testing out every different scenario
of which cards would beat which other cards for hours, sometimes three or four at a time. But put in the work, the rewards are obvious. So I'd know exactly what card
you've got in your hand from what cards I've got and I would know, probability wise, exactly what feature to pick on my card to defeat, statistically, any card that you
could have in your hand at that precise moment.
You will never win.
Could still be fun, though.
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:51,
archived)
of which cards would beat which other cards for hours, sometimes three or four at a time. But put in the work, the rewards are obvious. So I'd know exactly what card
you've got in your hand from what cards I've got and I would know, probability wise, exactly what feature to pick on my card to defeat, statistically, any card that you
could have in your hand at that precise moment.
You will never win.
Could still be fun, though.

I recognised it but couldn't quite picture which dickhead was saying it in which programme/film.
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:56,
archived)

needs additional blank card for the atheist vote
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 13:53,
archived)

or at least the earthly equivalent, 'being quite irate at times'
( ,
Thu 10 May 2007, 14:02,
archived)