b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 7395808 (Thread)

# TJ : where is JollyJack?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:53, archived)
# probably wanking over squirrels.
Why do people tolerate that kind of perversion?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:53, archived)
# it's fucked up and no mistakes
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:55, archived)
# Have you followed that link?
They are women pretending to be animals and it's sick and odd, yet JJ presents animals as sex objects.

it fucking sickens me, it really does.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:57, archived)
# because...
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:56, archived)
# That made me laugh.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:59, archived)
# I can't seem to get a reply from Jolly Jack though :(
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:59, archived)
# "The Observer magazine just about summed him up,
smug, self-satisfied."
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:01, archived)
# He is successful?
but he draws squirrels with tits?

I suppose speciality porn sells, paedophiles make good money too I hear.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:03, archived)
# No, that was just a quote from a Fall song
but it seemed appropriate.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:05, archived)
# did someoen say squirrel with tits?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:16, archived)
# Hey a succesful artist has no right to be either of those things!
No, wait, yes, yes, he does.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:33, archived)
# haha
that's way better than the real thing
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:59, archived)
# :D
:D *GLEE*
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:10, archived)
# toleration I can understand
the celebration of it I can not
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:57, archived)
# I really like his work with the spider and the scorpion.
It's not particularly original, but it is very good, but I have had to put him on ignore because he will not stop posting beastiality pictures.

it'd be okay if they were funny, but they're just 'look! a cat! and i want to fuck it!'

it's just sick.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:00, archived)
# I disagree with your title text, surreal does not equal surreal humour, squiggle and squiggle are not funny
from there on in, I pretty much agree totally.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:04, archived)
# No, surreal does not equal surreal humour,
but I enjoyed those. He can draw too, there is no doubt about it, but if he was drawing kids with tits people would get pissed off, why do they not mind when it is animals.

Fuck, cats don't live long enough to reach the age of consent :)
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:07, archived)
# I had a 16 year old cat!
I'm more down on him than is justified because I can't stand/understand the attendant sycophancy.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:09, archived)
# *calls the police*
that cat was underage!... oh you had one as a pet... *puts the phone down on the police*
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:11, archived)
# and hence derives the term 'underage pussy'
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:12, archived)
# Well...
it's not like he advocates fucking actual cats... the figures he draws are highly anthropomorphised and stylized animals, and in any case he doesn't show them engaged in sexual acts.
Whatever your feelings about his style and the content of his comics, I think you have to concede that he does possess enormous ability. I think that's mainly why people are so responsive to his posts. Or not?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:24, archived)
# You are waaaaay more turned on by fluffy erotica than I am!
I enjoy the anime style human animal hybrid cheescake pics. Most of the bodies look (just a bit, heh) idealized, but that's anime.
Since they don't make me want to fuck a cat, I am free to enjoy them for the prettiness of the artwork.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:20, archived)
# launches httrack
for the archives, you know
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:00, archived)