![Challenge Entry: New Uses For Old Monuments [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
From the New Uses For Old Monuments challenge. See all 253 entries (closed)
( , Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:31, archived)

but by the magic of the interwebs even with no delay between frames it appears to be the same.
www.b3tards.com/u/976e0482d5f7b8a53847/angelwindfarm.gif
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:40,
archived)
www.b3tards.com/u/976e0482d5f7b8a53847/angelwindfarm.gif

but has anyone else had a message asking if one of their images can be used in ZOO?
Is it real or a blag?
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:35,
archived)
Is it real or a blag?

I know they were just stealing a lot of images.
Talk to riverghost, he'll be able to help.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:36,
archived)
Talk to riverghost, he'll be able to help.

and it says if I don't respond they won't publish it...
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:37,
archived)

they're a bit... cuntish.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:40,
archived)

they even said they would pay me for some, too but I still rejected them.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:37,
archived)

And they all eat shit from fields.
'Ning DYSLEXIA.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:37,
archived)
'Ning DYSLEXIA.

I like it.
Did you make it, or what is Dyslexia?
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:41,
archived)
Did you make it, or what is Dyslexia?

I can scribble things with paint.
I won't, because I'll get b3tan up.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:43,
archived)
I won't, because I'll get b3tan up.

but if you agree, they will own the copyright and you won't get anything in return
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:37,
archived)

if you get the meaning, as pavlovsdog says, talk to riverghost
:)
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:37,
archived)
:)

but I'd tell them to fuck off till they stop being total bastards.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:43,
archived)

some naughty scamp will cut it down and sell it to a scrap dealer who had "no idea what it was"
:D
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:32,
archived)
:D

in the traditional self incriminating way of doing things these days and putting the evidence on the net?
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:33,
archived)

the con artist who designed it got a few quid didn't he
:D
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:34,
archived)
:D

although i've never seen it in the rust, and even more annoyingly i rather like a lot of gormley's other stuff, didn't much care for the field at the time i saw it at the hayward but that was a few years back.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:46,
archived)

I tended to just let it meld in with the background scenery really when going past it
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:48,
archived)

i suggested that earlier on the day shift.
splendidly executed.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:34,
archived)
splendidly executed.

great mind and red wine.
not that i'm suggesting i was drunk at work.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:39,
archived)
not that i'm suggesting i was drunk at work.


and the grenation of the amount of concrete needed for a base for one of them more then offsets their green status.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:44,
archived)


Got any stats to back that up?
Oh please oh please oh please say yes...
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 22:48,
archived)
Oh please oh please oh please say yes...

infact a turbine company was rapped on the knuckles for over playing up the estimated power that their turbines were to produce.
household turbines
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2006/11/are_domestic_wind_turbines_an_ecocon.html
a splendid site linked off the bbc one.
www.timhunkin.com/a125_arch-windpower.htm
tut-tut nawty turbines
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/09/nwind09.xml
commercial turbines
www.davidbellamy.co.uk/wind.htm
it's bloody david bellamy, innit.
dont't get me wrong, i'm all in favour of renewable energy, but i just don't think this is the way and the facts have been glossed over slightly for share holders, offshore is by far the bvest way to go, rather then ruining the landsacpe of britan with them.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 23:05,
archived)
household turbines
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2006/11/are_domestic_wind_turbines_an_ecocon.html
a splendid site linked off the bbc one.
www.timhunkin.com/a125_arch-windpower.htm
tut-tut nawty turbines
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/09/nwind09.xml
commercial turbines
www.davidbellamy.co.uk/wind.htm
it's bloody david bellamy, innit.
dont't get me wrong, i'm all in favour of renewable energy, but i just don't think this is the way and the facts have been glossed over slightly for share holders, offshore is by far the bvest way to go, rather then ruining the landsacpe of britan with them.

I've had the creeping feeling that they were being desperately oversold. Nice to have something to back that up.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 23:17,
archived)

and it's really only offshore ones that get near or over that mark.
they have also pushed through the development of britons largest turbines in devon, at over 400 foot high in a mid devon vally just above the dartmoor national park. like the ones in cumbria they are fleetingly outside the boundry of the designated national park where any application would automatically be turned down.
( ,
Thu 26 Jul 2007, 23:25,
archived)
they have also pushed through the development of britons largest turbines in devon, at over 400 foot high in a mid devon vally just above the dartmoor national park. like the ones in cumbria they are fleetingly outside the boundry of the designated national park where any application would automatically be turned down.