![Challenge Entry: Icon mini challenge [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
with my first ever icon attempt

little rage boy
be gentle

little rage boy
be gentle
From the Icon mini challenge challenge. See all 1079 entries (open)
( , Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:11, archived)

Aren't we protected from the DMCA by laws governing parody? My guess is there's a thin like inbetween parody and libel, though.
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:15,
archived)

That said, B3tards is US hosted.
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:16,
archived)

Then again, IIRC, the servers are in America?
edit : mindpiss
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:17,
archived)
edit : mindpiss

to frogland!
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:35,
archived)

67.15.109.64 is in Houston
whois.domaintools.com/67.15.109.64
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:51,
archived)
whois.domaintools.com/67.15.109.64

parody and theres people who wave pitchforks and torches shouting "burn him/her he/she's a witch etc" around these parts
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:17,
archived)

by virtue of not being in the USA
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:17,
archived)

That doesn't seem to stop 'em usually.
Even said, I think parody use is in english law too
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:19,
archived)
Even said, I think parody use is in english law too

Parody is US specific.
Rob can't really suffer as long as he continues to take reasonable steps to prevent us taking the piss, which involves asking in the FAQs and telling us on the board really.
The hosting of the images could be sued, but again reasonable measures to stop us would be enough.
I think he stands no chance and it's daft because he's just making himself a target.
I also disagree that anyone would be overly hurt by these images, certainly the hippy riding a badger bandwagon was as offensive and I enjoyed it.
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:25,
archived)
Rob can't really suffer as long as he continues to take reasonable steps to prevent us taking the piss, which involves asking in the FAQs and telling us on the board really.
The hosting of the images could be sued, but again reasonable measures to stop us would be enough.
I think he stands no chance and it's daft because he's just making himself a target.
I also disagree that anyone would be overly hurt by these images, certainly the hippy riding a badger bandwagon was as offensive and I enjoyed it.

if I ever become famous i'll just shop pictures of myself being chased by badgers or something
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:27,
archived)

The announcement I mean.
Tell me it isn't?
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:18,
archived)
Tell me it isn't?

Some people just can't take a joke, eh? At least rob won't sue us for putting pictures of him up.
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:22,
archived)

"We also ask our members to avoid photoshoping Prince" as if it might happen by accident...
"I'll just photoshop this kitten... ah fuck, it's turned out as Prince with a coconut sticking out of his arse... Bastard."
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:23,
archived)
"I'll just photoshop this kitten... ah fuck, it's turned out as Prince with a coconut sticking out of his arse... Bastard."

"I don't think the people who posted them would like to be on receiving end of that kind of treatment.
"There's poking fun and there's poking fun and people are clearly taking it too far and crossing over the boundaries of what is acceptable."
THIS IS B3ta!
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:28,
archived)
"There's poking fun and there's poking fun and people are clearly taking it too far and crossing over the boundaries of what is acceptable."
THIS IS B3ta!

New image challenge: photoshop websherriff as far up an 'unidentifiable' arse as possible.
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:32,
archived)

Rob used his veto, wants to move on. Can't say I'm shocked. Still shouldn't have apologised, or really took the piss!
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:38,
archived)

oh yeah, at their website
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:42,
archived)

Hmmmmm, wonder how he'd like being given the "Pr*nce treatment" on b3ta.
I sense another front-page apology
:P
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:48,
archived)
I sense another front-page apology
:P

there's laws that have varying degrees of reasonableness that allow rights to whatever party
then, there's people with a lot of money, who make it irrelavent
( ,
Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:29,
archived)
then, there's people with a lot of money, who make it irrelavent