
i understand the dilemma, of course, but your pic is a good example of an image which looks in no way pornographic unless the person viewing it actually peers at it for a while.
what i really hate about 'nsfw' is the idea that some fat, ugly, stinking corporation gets to own your eyeballs for 6-8 hours per day, and typically installs some tedious, neutered, puritanical nanny in charge of nonsense like dress codes, internet sites avaialable, etc.
i'm so goddamned glad i work from home most of the time.
oh - nice pic.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:10,
archived)
what i really hate about 'nsfw' is the idea that some fat, ugly, stinking corporation gets to own your eyeballs for 6-8 hours per day, and typically installs some tedious, neutered, puritanical nanny in charge of nonsense like dress codes, internet sites avaialable, etc.
i'm so goddamned glad i work from home most of the time.
oh - nice pic.


Hang on, that's only a reflection on the monitor glass.
Never mind.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:18,
archived)
Never mind.



Bears that like penguins don't like bears that like apples. QED.

Tho you'll find me more in /n/, /po/ and /tg/ than in /b/.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:30,
archived)

Anon tries to pass off some nonse about not having penchant for showing his off genital specularities to strangers.
:P
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:35,
archived)
:P

/aparently cripplingly dyslexic blof
edit: haha
*blog
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:47,
archived)
edit: haha
*blog

Anon (anonymous) tries to pass off some nonsense about not having penchant for showing off his genital peculiarities to strangers.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:58,
archived)

i saw your sitar pic while lurking the other day. i like her.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:23,
archived)

Perambulatory might be more horrific than prehensile.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:27,
archived)

*picks up a peanut*
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:33,
archived)

I'd been playing it for about 6 or 7 hours straight the other day and got to shoppin'
Apparently she's a famous sitar player.
I'VE NEVER FUCKING HEARD OF HER THOUGH.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:29,
archived)
Apparently she's a famous sitar player.
I'VE NEVER FUCKING HEARD OF HER THOUGH.

What are these tubes?
AND WHY ARE THEY NOT IN MY POSESSION IF THEY ARE MINE?
I demand to speak to the leader of internet.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:40,
archived)
AND WHY ARE THEY NOT IN MY POSESSION IF THEY ARE MINE?
I demand to speak to the leader of internet.

and its a little embarrassing, but whatever.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:27,
archived)

and it's lawyers
are scared shitless of them :D
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:31,
archived)
are scared shitless of them :D

...they hire people like me to flog them and sit on their faces.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:36,
archived)

although I thought I just had beer and played world of warcraft. I must be confused. 'ning!
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:14,
archived)

To be honest, it's nice to have a bit of warning.
Censorship is bad, but it's just common courtesy to say "hey, if you look at what I've been looking at, it might just harsh out your day".
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:32,
archived)
Censorship is bad, but it's just common courtesy to say "hey, if you look at what I've been looking at, it might just harsh out your day".

Whilst I don't have objections or take any offense at the content (although, this may say something about my mental state), I prefer to have the place shock-free. If there is a link and a warning, I find it perfectly fine, but if someone says "LOL, CHECK OUT THIS" and whacks up a tubgirl without me expecting it, it kind of throws me off balance.
Plus, you never know who could be standing behind you when you refresh...
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:34,
archived)
Plus, you never know who could be standing behind you when you refresh...

i just resent the 'w' of the 'nsfw' - as if employers have the right to demand we not view imagery they find abhorrent.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:35,
archived)

Now I understand.
Just a NS! would suffice.
I do agree, you make a perfectly valid point. One that clearly, I skimmed past like a knobber =]
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:37,
archived)
Just a NS! would suffice.
I do agree, you make a perfectly valid point. One that clearly, I skimmed past like a knobber =]

and, of course, just about everyone clicks on links labelled 'nsfw' anyway - we're like magpies and those four letters are so bright and shiny....
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:44,
archived)

I inspect every shock site before linking friends to it, unlike 90% of my friends do...
Unless they get tricked by me.
I only remembered the other day about someone trying to get me with "lemonparty.com"
I felt like a freak when I corrected them to .org
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:53,
archived)
Unless they get tricked by me.
I only remembered the other day about someone trying to get me with "lemonparty.com"
I felt like a freak when I corrected them to .org

i have a pop-up blocker. lemonparty me all you like. tubgirl away. goatse all day and night. it's just an anatomy lesson.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:00,
archived)

The problem is that if somebody (anyone - other staff around the office, your managers, other managers, the cleaners, various contractors) sees nasty shit on your computer and feels litigious, they can get a large cash payout from the company.
I have to warn people about it all the time (I have a team of degenerate deviants - I hired them myself). I'm not going to fire anyone for a problem that didn't occur, but some things just aren't cool. It's like whacking off on the bus and calling people prudes if they get upset.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:42,
archived)
I have to warn people about it all the time (I have a team of degenerate deviants - I hired them myself). I'm not going to fire anyone for a problem that didn't occur, but some things just aren't cool. It's like whacking off on the bus and calling people prudes if they get upset.

i think that is a good part of it, but i also think it's used as a convenient excuse so those gentle souls who live sheltered lives can have a firm base to build their arguments from.
i think the more close analogy would be someone getting miffed because i was on a bus not wacking off but looking at a book of pictures which seemed erotic or pornographic when glanced at if you were to invade my space and peer into the book i'm holding.
or am i nuts?
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:48,
archived)
i think the more close analogy would be someone getting miffed because i was on a bus not wacking off but looking at a book of pictures which seemed erotic or pornographic when glanced at if you were to invade my space and peer into the book i'm holding.
or am i nuts?

A rare state of being in this world. Don't stop now.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:51,
archived)

except rather than reading a book, you were holding a poster out in front of you and at least 5 other people could see.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:52,
archived)

i just think we devolve when we have to pretend to be concerned with what the most sensitive people fear 100% of the time.
i'm all for being polite, just not for being forced to be polite at gunpoint.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:58,
archived)
i'm all for being polite, just not for being forced to be polite at gunpoint.

I mean for fuck's sake, either shit or get off the pot.
That's what I'd say to those guntoters.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:04,
archived)
That's what I'd say to those guntoters.

so as to obtain information, from you specifically :)
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:41,
archived)

I make sure I don't employ easily offended people. Those types usually leave during the interview.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 7:53,
archived)

a lot of people i've chatted with, not so much.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:02,
archived)

If you're using their internet access, in their office, on their time.
And the reason is because as someone else pointed out, in our current culture of blame the company is liable for it if you offend someone else who looks over your shoulder.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:41,
archived)
And the reason is because as someone else pointed out, in our current culture of blame the company is liable for it if you offend someone else who looks over your shoulder.

they can suck my ass. as i said, i work from home for the most part. they ought to pay everyone double just for being cocks.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:48,
archived)

actually 'night for me. i'm off to bed.
discomeats is paying everyone, see him for your czech.
( ,
Tue 27 Nov 2007, 8:58,
archived)
discomeats is paying everyone, see him for your czech.