
A bit larger that what I like, but for some reason jpgs don't compress this very well. Probably because of the shear randomness of the image. Physically, a very tiny woodcut for me., about 4'x4'.
thanks. i want to refine the tips of the branches a bit and print off a couple more. Too late now though.
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:13,
archived)
*goes into a huff*
seem to be having some interweb problems, earlier I could only access b3ta using the ip address :|
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:13,
archived)
seem to be having some interweb problems, earlier I could only access b3ta using the ip address :|
I BET FOXYG WILL TAKE IT DOWN BEFORE YOU SEE IT AND YOU'LL BE SORRY.
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:15,
archived)
I've just replaced it with one that's complete shat.
edit: crap. no more posting for me... 1 shy from 1000.
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:16,
archived)
edit: crap. no more posting for me... 1 shy from 1000.
I just leeched it to a bunch of other messageboards and claimed it was mine. NOW YOU'VE MADE ME LOOK BAD, THANKS A LOT.
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:17,
archived)
HEY FOXYG CAN'T REPLY NOW, LET'S TALK ABOUT FUN STUFF.
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:21,
archived)
Maybe I'll make a picture first.
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:24,
archived)
maybe next time. I ended up reading about daguerreotypes and now I need to sleep.
G'night all :)
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:41,
archived)
G'night all :)
might as well take a few commuters out as well while I top meself...
any favoured methods... or do I just go for the big gun?
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:18,
archived)
any favoured methods... or do I just go for the big gun?
Perhaps your browser doesn't display those. It's kind of an old format.
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:16,
archived)
that explains everything
Mine is only compatible with etching's 2.0
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:20,
archived)
Mine is only compatible with etching's 2.0
Mine goes all the way back to daguerreotypes 1.02
(,
Tue 5 Feb 2008, 6:22,
archived)