![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Fat Britain"){kind=small}
Hold on to your lunchEdit: Faster, with shading but no better.
From the Fat Britain challenge. See all 260 entries (closed)
(
Bela Lugosi's Dad,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 7:20,
archived)
so half the planet never sees the moon in this crazy model of yours.damn you and your anti-science hate-speech.
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 7:36,
archived)
Model?This is the TRUTH. It says so here, therefore it is true.
( Bela Lugosi's Dad,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 7:41,
archived)
the internet is just a lie spreading hatemachine. gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 7:46,
archived)
I haven't shot my lunch yet
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 7:36,
archived)
that reminds me of that toy.the one from my childhood that only girls were allowed to play with.
(
postbear has metal knees,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 8:27,
archived)
This is actually what happens you knowBut obviously once a month, and not quite as much.
(,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 8:58,
archived)
Oh, andIf you took time lapse photography over the month, you might set it at 7.25 days or something, then the planet would actually have the same bit facing the moon all the time.
My only complaint is that the orbit of the moon seems to be at 90 degrees to the plane of orbit of the sun, as the sun must be directly behind the observer for the planet to be constantly lit up. Which is absurd.
(,
Fri 4 Jul 2008, 9:01,
archived)
My only complaint is that the orbit of the moon seems to be at 90 degrees to the plane of orbit of the sun, as the sun must be directly behind the observer for the planet to be constantly lit up. Which is absurd.