
So I suppose God changing the properties of physics to introduce light refraction would be a miracle (if it wasn't such a massive load of bollocks).
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 10:32,
archived)


Much as I find them hard to believe in, Science can't disprove most miracles.
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 10:52,
archived)

its only stories in a book and therefore nothing to be disproved.
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 10:54,
archived)

There's a limit to what Science can prove.
I don't believe in them either, but I'd consider it arrogant to say there's no possibility of them ever having happened.
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 10:57,
archived)
I don't believe in them either, but I'd consider it arrogant to say there's no possibility of them ever having happened.

but miracles as in the biblical sense are surely nonsense. Miracles as in someone surviving a terrible illness (when they really shouldn't) exist of course, but then its not a real miracle is it?
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 11:00,
archived)

And there's probably some rational explanation for why one person survives when others don't.
But it's impossible to be certain about either.
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 11:03,
archived)
But it's impossible to be certain about either.

yeah - that's never happened before
there ought to be the 'miracle of having a dump'
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 11:04,
archived)
there ought to be the 'miracle of having a dump'

I have a miracle dump after ever kebab as in 'its a miracle my guts didnt come out with it'.
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 11:06,
archived)

"I've never seen it happen, therefore it never does"? Noone told me.
Religions tend not to care much about proving things, they go by faith. Science has to prove anything it wants to say.
( ,
Thu 4 Sep 2008, 11:14,
archived)
Religions tend not to care much about proving things, they go by faith. Science has to prove anything it wants to say.