b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Animated Smilies 2.0 » Message 8754809 (Thread)

[challenge entry] hai!

From the Animated Smilies 2.0 challenge. See all 157 entries (closed)

(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 20:58, archived)
# ARSEPISH
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 20:59, archived)
# I've never seen the video, is it landing on her own face?
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:00, archived)
# i've never seen a video of it either
and yes, yes it is
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:01, archived)
# yes
*awaits eelgirl post* lol
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:02, archived)
# I think it was just an image.
But yes, yes it is.

THIS IS A VERY NSFW LINK- DO NOT BLAME ME IF YOU CLICK IT AND ARE FOR SOME UNFATHOMABLE REASON NOT EXPECTING A GIRL SHITTING ON HER OWN FACE IN SUPERHEROIC FASHION images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/9/98/Tubgirl.jpg
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:02, archived)
# The thing which always intrigues me about that picture
is why she went to the effort of cutting eye holes in those pieces of plasticy cheese you put in burgers.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:04, archived)
# It's her superhero costume.
I always thought that, anyway. Cosplay etc.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:05, archived)
# I would have thought that it was more likely that she didn't want to be recognised,
but due to whatever fetishry it is that provokes that kind of behaviour, she still wanted her own shit in her eyes.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:06, archived)
# I've given it some thought
and I'm still hopeful about the superhero outfit.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:12, archived)
# Look at your real experience of sexual fetish and tell me that it's still likely.
Sex offenders don't could as superheroes no matter how you dress them up (or not, in most cases).
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:15, archived)
# She's hardly a sex offender!
Costumes are rife in fetish. You're more than likely right though.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:18, archived)
# If she went out and tried to fight crime or social disorder by shitting on her own face,
I imagine she would be.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:20, archived)
# The thing that always intrigues me is the fact that someone thoughtfully blurred out her vagina in case it offended
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:06, archived)
# japanese (seemingly only) obscenity law states
that pubic hair is strictly forbidden
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:08, archived)
# Probably japanese in that case.
Although they usually uniformly mosaic rather than blur, probably so people who find pixels arousing can wank their rotten cocks stupid.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:08, archived)
# I've just done a google image search
well, a few pages. No vagina. Well, not on her.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:11, archived)
# does she not know how to shit into a toilet?
it's almost instinctive

perhaps she should see a therapist
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:05, archived)
# Or front a punk band.
That Johnny Tourette. She could shit on him until he shuts the fuck up.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:07, archived)
# i think it may be
something to do with porn
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:07, archived)
# would
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:00, archived)
# Hooray!
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:01, archived)
# Now animate the original
I won't watch it, but I'd like to know how far you get before boking all over your keyboard.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:01, archived)
# original?
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:02, archived)
# I know the original, unfortunately.
I don't need to see it again. Ever.
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:03, archived)
# \o/

I knew I could count on you
(, Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:04, archived)
# Ha ha ha ha ha!
You terrible man!
(, Fri 19 Sep 2008, 13:20, archived)