
by not being able to watch Jonathon Ross.
Also, I would like to know how many complaints Gordon Ramsays program tonight will get!
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:05,
archived)
Also, I would like to know how many complaints Gordon Ramsays program tonight will get!

go back in time and not have her in a Bond film too?
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:51,
archived)

We know they scour these pages for images, why not self-righteous outrage too?
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:53,
archived)

DO SOMETHING THE PUBLIC ACTUALLY AGREE WITH FOR A CHANGE RATHER THAN SHOUTING INDIGNATLY ABOUT STUFF WE DON'T CARE ABOUT!
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:59,
archived)

which is annoying really because I generally like Ramsey's hoarding of Tv programming and I shouldn't because it's cuntish. With this one I thought 'Oh God more Ramsey TV, I bet it's bollocks'
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:12,
archived)

There was one bit where a man simulated anal sex with a carrot. But I guarantee there will be no complaint! Not that I am saying there should be of course, but just pointing out the double standards.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:15,
archived)

Surely they won't do anything offensive or un-expected!
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:17,
archived)

After they started licking cream off each others nipples though, I thought they would have cut the link :D
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:18,
archived)


Did you see HIGNFY tonight? Ian Hislop said that the last time Russell Brand was on the show, he didn't feel he was given enough respect!
LOL!
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:20,
archived)
LOL!

I don't really have control over the remote from 7pm onwards.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:23,
archived)

there will be a few repeats during the week :D
EDIT: Or of course, HIGNFY :D/
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:24,
archived)
EDIT: Or of course, HIGNFY :D/

of free time myself :D
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:31,
archived)

and watching either tomorrow night or sun before work
but i'd also advise waiting for the extended hignfy
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:37,
archived)
but i'd also advise waiting for the extended hignfy

but I know I will watch the extended version anyway :D
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:48,
archived)

and monky, there's always iplayer. I suggest waiting until Have i got a bit more... is put up as it's that little bit more enjoyable
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:26,
archived)

I'm watching the latest Spooks and they just said 'shut down the internet'
*facepalm*
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:44,
archived)
*facepalm*

but it makes sense in the long run.
Missed a lot of last series, really think Ros and that other blonde bit are gonna piss me off. also not impressed with the "lets put some random black bloke in to replace Danny, but not give him any decent plots"
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:48,
archived)
Missed a lot of last series, really think Ros and that other blonde bit are gonna piss me off. also not impressed with the "lets put some random black bloke in to replace Danny, but not give him any decent plots"

Do you ever get sick of double-double-agents?
Is that a tripple agent or a quadruple agent?
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:59,
archived)
Is that a tripple agent or a quadruple agent?

and i think Lucas is gonna be a decent agent, but hopefully future story lines are gonna be a tad more complicated than "Russia'll get pissed off when we tell them you're a mole even though we've got no evidence, come work for us"
( ,
Sat 1 Nov 2008, 0:04,
archived)

I'm waiting for when Tom suddenly appears out of nowhere, and they start bringing people back from the dead.
EDIT: And it looks like they're killing off more talent next week - they go through contracts faster than the rest of the BBC.
( ,
Sat 1 Nov 2008, 0:11,
archived)
EDIT: And it looks like they're killing off more talent next week - they go through contracts faster than the rest of the BBC.

Tom could come back as a foreign operative.
they didn't kill off that geeky one did they? i liked her, malcolm looks lost without her and Colin.
either that or they'll do a 24 and kill off all of them except Lucas, harry, and old girl who're all in harry's sealed office (despite the fact he hasn't even got an automatic door)
edit: nah they're not. i caught the end of the episode on three, cos my dad had flicked on despite not seeing either of the first two eps, or the first 58 mins of that ep.
it works with spooks because it shows them as human after all. but must be expensive when they do a faulkner (as it's become known)
( ,
Sat 1 Nov 2008, 0:14,
archived)
they didn't kill off that geeky one did they? i liked her, malcolm looks lost without her and Colin.
either that or they'll do a 24 and kill off all of them except Lucas, harry, and old girl who're all in harry's sealed office (despite the fact he hasn't even got an automatic door)
edit: nah they're not. i caught the end of the episode on three, cos my dad had flicked on despite not seeing either of the first two eps, or the first 58 mins of that ep.
it works with spooks because it shows them as human after all. but must be expensive when they do a faulkner (as it's become known)


she wasn't too happy with me ripping the oven out of the kitchen and dragging it into the front room in order to participate
she's gonna sue C4 for the price of the new kitchen which asploded
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:12,
archived)
she's gonna sue C4 for the price of the new kitchen which asploded

and i do want to try his venison in chocolate sauce, but resent this belief C4 have that everyone has a telly in their kitchen.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:24,
archived)

DID YOU SEE THEM COOKING! NIGHTMARE! I'D HAVE HAD A STROKE...
Over the RyanAir ladies.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:27,
archived)
Over the RyanAir ladies.

The RyanAir trolley dollies have always been munters on my flights!
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:33,
archived)

I literally fitted into my seat. The only part of my body I could manouvre was my head, far enough to rest my forehead on the seat in front.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:37,
archived)

(not the emergency seat) than on a train or a bus in the UK
I know this from experience.
I don't see what people's problem is, it's not as if they claim they're anything they're not.
if you don't like it pay more for your ticket and fly from an airport in another city
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:42,
archived)
I know this from experience.
I don't see what people's problem is, it's not as if they claim they're anything they're not.
if you don't like it pay more for your ticket and fly from an airport in another city

When I flew Business Class to New York I was confused at being lost in my seat D:
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:51,
archived)

Personally I would avoid them, even before experiencing their flights.
(*ALTHOUGH* I may have been in the smaller seats, the last row at the back.)
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:51,
archived)
(*ALTHOUGH* I may have been in the smaller seats, the last row at the back.)

you get to see the engine split apart on landing :D
except for the front row, and two middle exit rows all the seats are the same size and identical. what pissed me off when we flew to spain was that their seats no longer recline (presumably cheaper) so i was quite uncomfortable when i woke up. but i didn't pay for the flights so men
( ,
Sat 1 Nov 2008, 0:28,
archived)
except for the front row, and two middle exit rows all the seats are the same size and identical. what pissed me off when we flew to spain was that their seats no longer recline (presumably cheaper) so i was quite uncomfortable when i woke up. but i didn't pay for the flights so men

and Ryanair aren't particularly bad. I've had less legroom on BA than I get on Ryanair and there's a lot of trains -- Scotrail spring immediately to mind -- and pretty much any coach that has a lot less legroom.
Just a pity that where I live the only way of getting to Ryanair's airports is two hours on a coach...
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:55,
archived)
Just a pity that where I live the only way of getting to Ryanair's airports is two hours on a coach...

although easyjet are better
US airways transatlantic have a tranny :(
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:37,
archived)
US airways transatlantic have a tranny :(

I don't know whether falling asleep would be better or worse.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:39,
archived)

and i'd upgraded so didn't worry since she was servicing economy.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:44,
archived)

But I think that most of them take their orange uniform too far to include their skin :D
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:50,
archived)

me and my dad (6'1" and 6'4" respectively) got exit seats on the way out to spain, so i got to spend a long time staring at our hungover stewardess's arse. think that might be why my dad "let me have" the window seat on the flight back
( ,
Sat 1 Nov 2008, 0:00,
archived)

It's a pity the old hags at BBC listen to the demands of a wannabe satanic slut?
Over the genuis entertainer the man is??
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:12,
archived)
Over the genuis entertainer the man is??

I think it was a fair price to pay to get rid of Russell Brand.
Unfortunately he will probably get another well paid job very quickly. All publicity is good publicity in the celebrity world :(
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:15,
archived)
Unfortunately he will probably get another well paid job very quickly. All publicity is good publicity in the celebrity world :(

Just look at the support that Ponderland was given this week.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:17,
archived)

I think the resultint poot would block the toilet
then I'd have to chisel the fucker out
:D
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:20,
archived)
then I'd have to chisel the fucker out
:D

and I will complain to the daily mail
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:20,
archived)

yes
infact, I'm going to have to have a quick play of "hang on" now
brb
edit: bah, too hard on a keyboard
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:35,
archived)
infact, I'm going to have to have a quick play of "hang on" now
brb
edit: bah, too hard on a keyboard

But if it gets rid of Brand, it's a good thing.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:28,
archived)

if he was ten years younger and a bit slimmer, that cheeky smile would have got him out of this shit.
( ,
Fri 31 Oct 2008, 23:30,
archived)