
you're several years too late - last time I looked, it was called "nu".
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:08,
archived)

but if my life only came in these colours, i'd end it.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:10,
archived)

you could save it as a transparent gif, let the grey background here show through.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:19,
archived)


Stencil for what?
It's not going to be any kind of street art aid.
It's not actually a stencil, it's rather some very poorly optimised shapes.
It's very, very badly optimised showing artefacts.
Are you proud to take up front page real estate at the expense of those that make an effort?
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:12,
archived)
It's not going to be any kind of street art aid.
It's not actually a stencil, it's rather some very poorly optimised shapes.
It's very, very badly optimised showing artefacts.
Are you proud to take up front page real estate at the expense of those that make an effort?

You dont get it?
when you look at a monitor you dont see the outside world, just the monitor, however now i say that you should notice evereything else.
perhaps you are right though that i should appeal to the wider audience.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:15,
archived)
when you look at a monitor you dont see the outside world, just the monitor, however now i say that you should notice evereything else.
perhaps you are right though that i should appeal to the wider audience.

I'm just not a pretentious cunt.
I also happen to know that a stencil has to work on negative space, so that's 2 colours you lank-haired twat.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:18,
archived)
I also happen to know that a stencil has to work on negative space, so that's 2 colours you lank-haired twat.

But in my comprehension of the world a 2 or 3 layer stencil would actually be 2 or 3 different stencils that you use to create an image with an overlay technique.
Stencil, by the very definition is a positive and negative space. What you do with it is your own bollocks or Banksy shite.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:23,
archived)
Stencil, by the very definition is a positive and negative space. What you do with it is your own bollocks or Banksy shite.

the entire history of stencilling involves layers - think of it as you do photoshopping, where many images use different layers combined to make up a final image.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:27,
archived)

A fucking 6th form art lesson. I obviously need that.
The image produced is not a stencil. We were talking stencils. I didn't even get around to the fact that his 'stencil' just won't work in real life.
It's just some pretentious bollocks to post on b3ta that anyone can do in 30 seconds.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:31,
archived)
The image produced is not a stencil. We were talking stencils. I didn't even get around to the fact that his 'stencil' just won't work in real life.
It's just some pretentious bollocks to post on b3ta that anyone can do in 30 seconds.

the image s/he put up isn't as accomplished as what you can make - that's ok, we all start somewhere. since we are discussing stencils, i can see that it could easily work if you use layers, something that may not be as common in street art where you are, but is very often done here and almost always done in silk-screening.
if you don't like the technical ability shown in the pic, that's fine. if you don't like the message it's intended to convey, that's also fine. many of us get touchy here when we see the 'standards' of b3ta dropping too low, but jumping on everyone for putting up pics that don't please you is just mean - once in a while you have to try and be charitable by offering helpful tips or asking what the person posting is trying to accomplish.
i think you too often take your role as rude contrarian more seriously than necessary. yes, b3ta can have standards, but if they require that we rudely question the self-worth of others, perhaps those standards aren't worth much.
i say this as one of the people here who gets along with you but who dislikes the manner (and primarily the manner, not the content) of some of your interactions here.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:47,
archived)
if you don't like the technical ability shown in the pic, that's fine. if you don't like the message it's intended to convey, that's also fine. many of us get touchy here when we see the 'standards' of b3ta dropping too low, but jumping on everyone for putting up pics that don't please you is just mean - once in a while you have to try and be charitable by offering helpful tips or asking what the person posting is trying to accomplish.
i think you too often take your role as rude contrarian more seriously than necessary. yes, b3ta can have standards, but if they require that we rudely question the self-worth of others, perhaps those standards aren't worth much.
i say this as one of the people here who gets along with you but who dislikes the manner (and primarily the manner, not the content) of some of your interactions here.

however, replacing the letter 'o' with '0' is annoying to read.
cheers :)
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:54,
archived)
cheers :)

way dickhead.
All that would happen is you might cause a few keys to repeat. You would not be posting on b3ta if that was the case.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 20:11,
archived)
All that would happen is you might cause a few keys to repeat. You would not be posting on b3ta if that was the case.

as someone who's tired of your manner and responses to me so join the list of my other haters, you all seem to post together anyway.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:52,
archived)

i'm off now, time to go visit the kitties. see you all later.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:53,
archived)

Black and white is tw0 c0lurs???
theres n0 need t0 get all 0ffensive is there?
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:21,
archived)
theres n0 need t0 get all 0ffensive is there?

the stencl wall be en blac en wheyte :D
btw yu0 are a pretentious cunt.
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:29,
archived)
btw yu0 are a pretentious cunt.

an irritating fool. Debate the subject, defend your work or just slink away and consider not being a threadwasting cunt in future,
( ,
Sun 2 Nov 2008, 19:45,
archived)