
Typically though I have had irritating little probs with ATI so probably nvidia.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:36,
archived)

and had loads of trouble. now i've got an nVidia mobo and graphics card and it runs like a dream.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:36,
archived)

Nvidia three, ATI nil.
and lots of stupid shit from that other place
edit: i seem to recall having problems with ATI drivers as well
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:37,
archived)
and lots of stupid shit from that other place
edit: i seem to recall having problems with ATI drivers as well

The two companies are really quite evenly matched. It's not like AMD and Intel where one side is steamrolling the other.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:42,
archived)

Sort of, and AMD may already have binned ATI.
For some reason ATI only hires idiots. NV on
the other hand is filled with idiots from top down.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:45,
archived)
For some reason ATI only hires idiots. NV on
the other hand is filled with idiots from top down.

but i'm talking graphics cards. AMD is doing pretty bad at processors at the moment, but AMD/ATi is doing fine with graphics cards
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:46,
archived)

Drivers, however, have not been good since before that time (2000ish?).
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:49,
archived)

nvidia it is then....
www.ebuyer.com/product/150605/show_product_specifications?spectype=extended
looks interesting...anyone understand any of it?
and yes, about forty quid is the extent of my post-christmas budget
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:49,
archived)
www.ebuyer.com/product/150605/show_product_specifications?spectype=extended
looks interesting...anyone understand any of it?
and yes, about forty quid is the extent of my post-christmas budget

If it's for (new) video games, then it's not a good card to buy. But everything else should be fine.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:51,
archived)

the games i do play aren't graphics-heavy.
CAD, video editing, and being able to play HD stuff through my pc because it's cheaper than a HD-DVD player...my new hardware is up to it, but it came with a hole where the graphics card should be...
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:55,
archived)
CAD, video editing, and being able to play HD stuff through my pc because it's cheaper than a HD-DVD player...my new hardware is up to it, but it came with a hole where the graphics card should be...

really there's no way to know exactly how your card is going to work out in your computer, but getting a balance of people's opinions is a good way to go about it i guess.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 3:01,
archived)

that PNY card needs a 350w psu...
i only have 275w lump
fucking stupid dell shit, why stick a dual-core chip in a box with not enough power?
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 3:03,
archived)
i only have 275w lump
fucking stupid dell shit, why stick a dual-core chip in a box with not enough power?

has a 400w psu...
and it won't fit in this slim case
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 3:06,
archived)
and it won't fit in this slim case

but I can no longer remember why and am probably just wrong.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 3:10,
archived)

Or that might just have been my imagination. But it made me like them more, anyway.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 3:14,
archived)

i used to use ATI and it was good and so i stuck to them, but in recent years the driver updates (and shitty software they try and bundle with them) just cause loads of problems. I bought the cards for gaming and to be fair the graphics looked great...for the 20 seconds or so before it would crash.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:47,
archived)

But there are similar stories on both sides - for instance, my 8800 GTS was terrible at running Source games for some reason, always crashing, and I never found drivers that worked properly with every game.
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:49,
archived)

i bought an ATI card shortly after half life 2 came out because a) valve supposedly developed hl2 with ATI to make it super good and b) i'm a bit of a valve fanboy so wanted hl2 to look good when i played it so i thought getting an ATI would be a good move.
this was not the case
( ,
Sat 27 Dec 2008, 2:53,
archived)
this was not the case