b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9367058 (Thread)

# Airplanes are killing us and birds can dance.
I'm not sure if these facts are related.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:25, archived)
# When if you're stupid enough to get hit by a plane, then you're
getting all you deserve.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:26, archived)
# No, the New World Order are loading them up with canisters of deadly chemicals
for some poorly explained reason.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# "for some poorly explained reason"
pretty much sums it up.

:D
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# I think they're trying to make money by killing us or something
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:29, archived)
# Wasn't that the original business model for the the U.S. Air Force?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:30, archived)
# I'm glad they've moved onto bringing fiery death to infidels now.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:35, archived)
# Well, after they got that venture capital start-up loan, it all turned round for them...
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:40, archived)
# Oh right, ignore me asking then.
I live in Rothschild country and I'm alright.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# how are they killing us?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# Shhhhh!
It's a secret. Damn.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# They're actually saving us
by causing solar dimming
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# ^ this
;-)
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:29, archived)
# wait a minute
THEY?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:31, archived)
# Your government adores you,
That is why none of the CC cameras worked on 7/7, haha, they all malfunctioned at the same time, so now we have no videos of the "four bombers" doing their dirty work. Oh yea, don't forget that a drill was being run of bombers on trains with lots of people involved simulating terrorists
newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Soc/soc.culture.british/2006-07/msg00032.html

They wouldn't hurt us would they mommy?
.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:45, archived)
# now I don't know about you,
but shortly after 7/7 I distinctly remember lots of cctv footage of the four suspects - on the day itself - on every available news channel going,
mainly showing the four suspects movements around the city and public transport system. I'm not doubting there 'may' be more behind it,
but to claim that all the cctv cameras went down on that day is unadulterated bollocks of the highest order
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:47, archived)
# Except we have plent of CCTV of the bombers
They were all over the damn papers within two days of the bombings you idiot.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:48, archived)
# That is utter bollocks.
The pictures of them were all over the media.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:49, archived)
# They filmed the whole thing up to and beyond it.
And the face recognition software was what led them directly to the bombers house to arrest them.
As I said up there. It's easy to accept everything on the internet without doing any actual research but dangerous because most people spout nonsense in a bid for their 15 minutes of psuedo fame or respect of 'peers'
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:58, archived)
# haha, that is a good one, they filmed everything!!! rolling here
You saw stills of the four guys walking onto the train, did also know there was a drill being run by peter power involving lots people enacting a terror drill on the exact same trains, at the exact same time? If you investigated this 7/7 for ten minutes you would know the four guys were hired to be a part of the drill and used as the patsys, but you get your news from BBC, oh my god they would never lie to me would they mommy, get out of here with all this, you guys never investigate anything, you sit and wait for the news to show you what happened, and their version of events, admit it
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:16, archived)
# one more thing
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:17, archived)
# Let me let you into a little secret about Britain.
Cameras on buses rarely work. They are run by the private bus operators and cost money. They are meant to deceive and deter. The same is true of trains.
Cameras on the roads meant to trap speeders rarely work. They cost money and only are working on lucrative routes that are profitable ( ie. The A40 ).
There is nothing sinister about that. The local government funded and operated CCTV cameras were all working.
Reading between the lines is not investigation nor is any conclusion come to by such conjecture evidence of anything. It is merely a wish to invent a theory to support an idea.

Also looking glass news is not a reputable nor unbiased source of 'data'.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:26, archived)
# Can I just add 'cameras not working in bus blown to buggery' shocker
well said 'nonic, it's about balance
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:29, archived)
# conjecture
spread by people needing to fabricate plausible evidence to back up their implausible conclusions.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:21, archived)
# 'Investigated' != read a bunch of websites run by nutters with similar delusions as me.
grow up, really.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:26, archived)
# is their ccctv
of the police buggering up the cameras?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:59, archived)