b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Shatner! » Message 9499580 (Thread)

[challenge entry] 'Noon everyone, we all good?

From the Shatner! challenge. See all 361 entries (closed)

(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:13, archived)
# Cripes, is it noon already?
Whar'd my morning go?

Apart from sleeping...
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:15, archived)
# 2 and 6, 2 and mother fucking 6
It is a good job they aren't that price now or I would never leave bookshops
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:16, archived)
# Paperbacks have doubled in price in ten years.
FFS...
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:17, archived)
# they are £7.99 at the moment :(
they were £6.99 for long time, if they dropped the price more people would buy them, I say take the risk and drop the price to £5.99.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:19, archived)
# I don't get why this is so hard to understand.
I mean, with a lower price, more people are likely to buy it, right?

But instead, they just put up the price.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:21, archived)
# I know, this is what I don't get
If I went in to a bookshop and they are £7.99 I will only get one, maybe 3. If they were say £5.99, I would buy 4 or 6. They should also scrap hardbacks or only make them if people ask for them in a shop.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:35, archived)
# We had a lecture from a very-well known chemist the other month
about the future of book. Basically, he turned out to be a money-grabbing twonk who wants the entire second-hand book market closed down and he's clamouring for changes in copyright law so that when you buy a book, you don't actually own it.
He's trying to get his publisher to switch production to e-books that have limited licences so you have to renew it every year or term, but also so that the basic format is the bare minimum and you have to pay extra for answer to excercises, etc.
I said to him that it would only favour the richest students and he told me that education shouldn't have to be fair.
Cunt.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:24, archived)
# What a twat.
People like him are why society has gone to shit.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:25, archived)
# Yeah, but he gets enough hero worship from every other professor.
Because he's actually been heard of...
I was very tempted to report him for copyright infringement after he ripped off a section of a film for his talk.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:28, archived)
# Haha!
Would that have wiped the smug grin off his cuntish face, though?

See, I haven't even seen him and I passionately dislike him.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:30, archived)
# did he write one of the well known introductory 1st year chem texts?
and despite the fact that I like educational elitism in terms of effort, that is an extremely prickish attitude.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:27, archived)
# Uh huh...
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:28, archived)
# the only ones know (i have) are mcmurry and silberberg
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:32, archived)
# Neither of those two.
Mostly in phys. chem., but recently branched out in other fields - one his latest was savaged for the vast number of mistakes.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:35, archived)
# what a nobber.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:40, archived)
# Unrelated....
In the shatner .gif with the bird whose boobs are shatners head, who is the bird?
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:43, archived)
# which one? i haven't seen it?
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:47, archived)
# well
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:48, archived)
# I thought so
She does porn.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:50, archived)
# i'm all wanked out today.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:51, archived)
# Pffft
Reply of the month!
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:12, archived)
# oooh-oohh, who? :) I don't know any physical chemists, but I know a few organic chemists (especially vociferous open-source ones)..
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:47, archived)
# is he also a well known pillock?
ie appears in documentaries? articles in the gruanaid?
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:49, archived)
# dammit, this is like a fucking crossword clue! just tell me the name grrr! >:-{
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:52, archived)
# see 1 down
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:52, archived)
# "Gazebo"?!!? How does that help!
:)
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:57, archived)
# you don't like 20 questions? i've really enjoyed it.
shares a name with a diet.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:55, archived)
# ohhhhh.
takk.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:00, archived)
# Prof. P**** A*****
Don't know about any articles elsewhere.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:52, archived)
# yeah i worked that out. :)
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:54, archived)
# Aha.
Just looked at his wiki entry.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:55, archived)
# i google first year phys chem texts.
found him that way, I never did much chem, even though it's what i went to uni to do...
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:56, archived)
# Not many chemists stay in chemistry.
35% of Southampton chem graduates left to do accounting...
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:57, archived)
# Ah, I own a copy of elements of Phys Chem
Phys chem is for knobs anyway.

/Biochemist
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 12:58, archived)
# Inorganic rocks.
/spang
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:00, archived)
# concurs
/degree in biochemistry, now a bio/cheminformaticist ...er.. but not physical chemistry OH NO.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:02, archived)
# We're dangerously close to talking shop here.
We'll end up comparing lists of our publications in a minute...
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
# i don't wanna do that, all (1) of mine are in physics :S
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:06, archived)
# Aww, it'll get there.
Mind you, it's different in different fields. I've heard in physics one evry couple years ain't bad, but in other things, you need four a year or more.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:08, archived)
# I'm in maths now, where everyone gets away with 1 a year
(i'm a 1st year phd student so I'm pretty lucky to have what I've got)

in fields like optics/plasma, you'd need 4 to survive because if you don't publish, the ARC hates you.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:11, archived)
# I've just been lucky in the fields of research I'm in.
Lucky all round, really. I'm supposedly the youngest postdoc ever to have started at Bern and I managed to get a wodge of papers from my Ph. D. It was very odd giving undergrad lectures to people older than me.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:18, archived)
# hmm. I'd rather not. If publications were dick sizes, I would have a large sports car.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:18, archived)
# I'd have a large sniper rifle.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
# chemists can kiss my mathematical arse.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:05, archived)
# Another inorganic chap heard I'm into magnetism.
And said 'magnetism and masturbation are the same thing. Both happen in a dark place and it's a relief when they're over.'
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:07, archived)
# rofls.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:08, archived)
# I'm going to miss my SQUID.
Apparently, I have to go to Monash to use one.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:10, archived)
# the landsdowne does a good seafood basket. :)
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
# Pfft....
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:21, archived)
# I take exception to that remark.
Chemistry is fun*.



*dangerous, the way I did it anyway.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:17, archived)
# physics is phun.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:18, archived)
# i think all textual intellectual property should be licensed
thanks for reading this post, that'll be 50p please
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:17, archived)
# i saw you refreshing
it's 50p per page impression you know
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:17, archived)
# hmm, though this looks like a good idea on paper, it doesn't appear to work
how can i make money off the idea without needing it to actually perform?

hmm...

i'm selling options in the g foundation, who wants some?
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
# this should happen on page refreshes, with a picture of ceiling cat.
there's a philip k dick book where the main character has to argue with his door and fridge to let him use their services (opening services, both I suppose) as he hasn't paid them :)
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:21, archived)
# i can relate to that
berocca usually helps
(, Sat 6 Jun 2009, 13:38, archived)