You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9592148 (Thread)

# all for the sake of a £1 e/w double (placed)
I've just had an interesting chat with a person from William Hill, I placed a £1 e/w double on two horses, they were both placed and my receipt showed that they were both accepted at the price of 7/1 with 1/4 odds for the place (guaranteed) which should have given a return of £7.56, imagine my joy when I saw the return was only £6.60, so I used the instant chat to contact Hills, this is the chat that took place

Hi, my name is *******. How can I help today? [04:57:03 PM]
*******: I had an e/w double both placed the return is a bit loer than I thought, there doesn't appear to be any rule 4 ref ******* [04:58:11 PM]
*******: Hi, *******. Let me check that for you. I will be back in 2-3 minutes. [05:01:19 PM]
*******: ok [05:01:53 PM]
*******: I'm still checking on it. May I ask for few more minutes? [05:04:57 PM]
*******: no problem [05:05:40 PM]
*******: Thank you for waiting, *******. [05:07:00 PM]
*******: ok [05:07:46 PM]
*******: As we have checked the bet settlement of your bet reference of *******, it has been settled correctly, *******. [05:07:28 PM]
*******: Is there anything else I can assist you with? [05:09:01 PM]
*******: but two 7/1 placed horses both at 1/4 should give around £7.56. shouldn't it? [05:09:39 PM]
*******: Please be informed that you have placed your bet at 14:18:36 last 2009-07-19. For your first selection of Danish Monarch, you have selected 7/1 and since the price changed, the accepted price when you have placed your bet was 4/1 last 2009-07-19 on 15:55:07. [05:13:44 PM]
*******: sorry but the slip says Danish Monarch @ Guaranteed Price (7/1) 3@1/4 Flashy Sir @ Guaranteed Price (7/1) 3@1/4 [05:15:03 PM]
*******: Please be informed that we were accepting the starting price of 4/1 last 2009-07-19 on 15:55:07 since you have placed your bet on 14:18:36 at 7/1. [05:16:21 PM]
*******: err, why? [05:18:28 PM]
*******: That's for your bet of Danish Monarch and for Flashy Sir, we accepted the 13/2 as the starting price. Please be informed that we are referring to the time when you have placed your bet and the time of acceptance of the price which have changed once the race started. [05:20:14 PM]
*******: so why does it say on my slip 'Danish Monarch @ Guaranteed Price (7/1) 3@1/4 Flashy Sir @ Guaranteed Price (7/1) 3@1/4' [05:21:35 PM]
*******: both guarrenteed at 7/1 [05:21:57 PM]
*******: That was the original price on your bet slip, *******. However, as your bet has been settled, our bettlers referred to the starting price when you have placed your bets. [05:32:06 PM]
*******: I'm sorry to make a meal of this but I didn't take the bet at SP as can be seen from my slip, so why do you keep refering to SP prices? [05:34:19 PM]
*******: Because that is the price that we have accepted based on the time you have placed your bets, *******. [05:35:04 PM]
*******: (thump thump thump) that's the sound of my head on the keyboard, I will repeat, I didn't take SP prices, I took the guaranteed prices of 7/1 amd 7/1, you are the one that keeps quoting SP prices without telling me why [05:38:09 PM]
*******: We are sorry about that, *******. Let me clarify, for your first selection, we used the guaranteed price of 7/1 and for your second selection, we used the 13/2 selection since this has the higher odds than 7/1. Please be informed that we based the prices whichever is higher. And the bet settlement of your bet is correct. [05:45:41 PM]
*******: a 7/1 and 13/2 placed at 1/4 odds would give a return of £7.22, the return on my slip says £6.60 [05:49:58 PM]
*******: For the price of 7/1 is at 1/4 and the 13/2 is at 1/5 which gives you £6.32. [05:51:54 PM]
*******: sorry but it's 1/4 for both [05:53:49 PM]
*******: We can see here in the system that for Flashy Sir, it is @ 1/5. [05:54:25 PM]
*******: on my slip it states Danish Monarch @ Guaranteed Price (7/1) 3@1/4 Flashy Sir @ Guaranteed Price (7/1) 3@1/4 [05:56:52 PM]
'*******'disconnected ('Concluded by Agent'). [06:00:47 PM]
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:20, archived)
# <<< FAIL THAT WAY


FFS. After two years too!
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:20, archived)
# oh my! failhorse is win!
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:22, archived)
# Yes but he broke is fail and had to be destroyed.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:23, archived)
# failhorse is copydex
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:25, archived)
# It's better than being ant'n'dex!
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:26, archived)
# :(
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:26, archived)
# Why dose Yahoo Mail always have or break down on a Friday,cause fights in other wise quit homes...

(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:20, archived)
#
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:48, archived)
# I WANT TO BUY SOME SHOES!!!
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:21, archived)
# err ok.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:22, archived)
# please gamble responsibly
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:22, archived)
# I'll take a nintendo wii, and xbox 360 and a 32" HDTV
Thanks
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:22, archived)
# show us your cock
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:22, archived)
# You dropped this 'a'
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:23, archived)
# No, we can clearly see that they are a cock
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:25, archived)
# Ah
Sorry I just thought we lacked the electron microscope to see their cock.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:27, archived)
# I am guessing that they own a electron microscope so they can in fact see their cock
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:30, archived)
# I'd've though a self portrait would have sufficed
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:32, archived)
# I wonder if they came from The Island of Doctor Moreau
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:36, archived)
# must be a real pain
having a cock smaller than a molecule of piss.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:32, archived)
# Or 'body' as he calls it.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:33, archived)
# Well, none of us would know about that
I am guessing that even a gnats cunt would still be slack to them
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:34, archived)
# Hello *******,
Please die in a fire.
Yours fucked-offingly,
ClanSoul
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:23, archived)
# what happened next?
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:23, archived)
# he went to the toilet,
and he flew out the window
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:24, archived)
# and then the dog pissed on the bridesmaids leg
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:25, archived)
# maybe it's leg had just grow?
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:34, archived)
# /talk board is that way>>>>>
(also FAIL)
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:24, archived)
# it would go down well there, for sure
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:25, archived)
# OMG your right
/talk would TOTALLY get a kick out of this story!!
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:26, archived)
#
talk + qotw
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:26, archived)
# Stop sending us your retards.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:54, archived)
# you have indeed filled a hole
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:24, archived)
# I bet you didn't read the faq
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:24, archived)
# What?
After two years?
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:27, archived)
# i haven't
someone told me what happens at the end :(
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:28, archived)
# The butler did it.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:34, archived)
# I wish these butler agencies would run police checks on their butlers
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:37, archived)
# Don't worry
Cr3 changes it every few weeks
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:42, archived)
# :D
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:48, archived)
# "There is somebody really annoying on the board, is it OK to be rude to them? Absolutely not."
Looks like the FAQ doesn't apply lolol
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:36, archived)
# that is true
but this guy is really REALLY annoying.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:37, archived)
#
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:38, archived)
# haha!
To be fair, it does now say that it's best not to post text on the main board, but I still can't quite understand the violence that follows. I mean ClanSoul looks like he's going to track the guy down and rape him.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:44, archived)
# rape with molotovs:
dangerous
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 19:03, archived)
# looks like I lost my bet
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:47, archived)
# Cock off
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:27, archived)
# It's almost like I care.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:27, archived)
# who the fuck are you?
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:30, archived)
# Hahahahaha
This justifies the thread
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:36, archived)
# But why haven't you compo'd it?
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:35, archived)
# Tell the Newsletter!
or don't.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 18:58, archived)
# LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS OF WORDS BUT NO PICTURE





WHY?
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 20:10, archived)
# you fill a much needed void
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 21:22, archived)
# They have stated that 13/2 is higher than 7/1
This is them being dim - chase again.
(, Sun 19 Jul 2009, 21:33, archived)