b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9627471 (Thread)

# repent sinners!


Click for bigger (154 kb)


fuck that, I'm off out to a party.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:14, archived)
# Will there be cake?
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:17, archived)
# may I congratulate you on your choice of username? It is most excellent.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:23, archived)
# DNA ftw
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:31, archived)
# this
is going to be shit...
www.6of3.com
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:49, archived)
# The man is dead, let him and his creation rest in peace, please, neither buy nor read this book.
besides, they all sucked after book 4. what is this guy a former fucking columbo writer? jesus tittyfucking christ.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:51, archived)
# *shudders with indescribable emotions*
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 13:06, archived)
# NO! nonononononono!


Sadly my font of DNA's handwriting font does not work on Vista or I'd've used that.

If it had to be done it should have been a collaboration between David Llyod, Terry Gilliam and Neil Gaiman. Possible Terry P too.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 13:29, archived)
# ...doesn't work on vista?
What?
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:03, archived)
# Why would a font not work on Vista?
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:06, archived)
# I know.
i even downloaded the file again and it's not happy.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:07, archived)
# Weird
what's the file extension?
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:09, archived)
# tff i think
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:10, archived)
# Very strange
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:20, archived)
# Some form of protest?
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:57, archived)
# Oh no
is nothing sacred?
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 13:34, archived)
# It's tragic when someone so utterly brilliant as DNA
has a family that will sell off rights for the cash. They sold the film rights to Disney after all and he was utter opposed to them doing a film of hitchiker's when he was alive.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 13:39, archived)
# He wasn't opposed to making a film though, that's why he moved to California.
I actually talked to him about it once. In 1991 in fact. He said at that point he was still trying to buy the rights back off Columbia and was working on a new script. He didn't want it made by someone who didn't get it essentially.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 13:58, archived)
# He was not opposed to the film and he met many times with Disney
They would not give him creative rights and this was why he was opposed to Disney doing it. He hated the scripts that he was presented by them and they would not make the changes he wanted.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:04, archived)
# not utterly opposed at all,
he was even quoted as saying that as long as Arthur was kept British in the casting, then the other charcaters could be chosen solely on merit
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:01, archived)
# Please see my above answer.
I am purely going by what I have found though my research of a guy who I always thought was a literary genius but also a technological pioneer.

He was not happy with any of the scripts Disney presented him and they would not make the changes that he insisted were made which was why he never gave them the go ahead.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 14:04, archived)
# yes
chocolate cake

with whipped cream and Cadburys flake over it.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:30, archived)
# I had a whip round and managed to get enough for party hats as well.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:32, archived)
# Mind if I gaz ya Riverghost??
Need an opinion on something.
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 13:07, archived)
# ...little old lady sitting at the back of the church says:
"But I habnt got any teebt."

"TEETH WILL BE PROVIDED"

/dave allen
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 12:21, archived)
# Will there be a wind...........
..and if so, will this wind be so mighty as to lay low the mountaines of the Earth?
(, Sat 8 Aug 2009, 13:43, archived)