Using maths to explain...maths
This picture courtesy of Wikipedia proves that 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ... = 1/3.
Let’s say the whole area in this picture has an area of 1. Now concentrate on the black squares. The one in the bottom left hand corner is 1/4 of the total area. The next black square is a quarter of the top right hand corner a quarter the size of the biggest black square so 1/16 of the total area. The next one is a quarter again 1/64 and so on. So we know that all of the black squares together are equal to 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ...
Now look at the grey squares. In total they are the same as the black squares. Similarly the white squares are in the same arrangement as the black squares. We have three identical sequences of squares and when added together they give the total area of 1. Consequently we can conclude each sequence of squares has area 1/3. So 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ... = 1/3.
I know this isn't funny but it is big and it is clever and I like this sort of thing.
From the Explain Stuff With Maths challenge. See all 249 entries (closed)
( , Sun 3 Jan 2010, 2:44, archived)
This picture courtesy of Wikipedia proves that 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ... = 1/3.
Let’s say the whole area in this picture has an area of 1. Now concentrate on the black squares. The one in the bottom left hand corner is 1/4 of the total area. The next black square is a quarter of the top right hand corner a quarter the size of the biggest black square so 1/16 of the total area. The next one is a quarter again 1/64 and so on. So we know that all of the black squares together are equal to 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ...
Now look at the grey squares. In total they are the same as the black squares. Similarly the white squares are in the same arrangement as the black squares. We have three identical sequences of squares and when added together they give the total area of 1. Consequently we can conclude each sequence of squares has area 1/3. So 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ... = 1/3.
I know this isn't funny but it is big and it is clever and I like this sort of thing.
From the Explain Stuff With Maths challenge. See all 249 entries (closed)
( , Sun 3 Jan 2010, 2:44, archived)
It's not big, thank fuck,
and it's not that clever either.
Fuck off!
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 2:48,
archived)
Fuck off!
This was supposed to be the opposite of sushi's post but now there's a fucking hamster in the middle.
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 2:51,
archived)
Too fucking late man!
TOO FUCKING LATE!
You have made me so angry now that I am going to listen to RAP MUSIC!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXMKmxR3avc
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 2:59,
archived)
You have made me so angry now that I am going to listen to RAP MUSIC!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXMKmxR3avc
Or, and just try this one out for size,
I don't garner pleasure from wearing animal costumes.
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 3:32,
archived)
It's okay, don't let sushi dictate the mood
Rage against the whoop
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 2:56,
archived)
I just found out that a snails anus is closer to its brain than almost all of its other organs.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Snail_diagram-en_edit1.svg
The fuck is up with that, man.
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 3:03,
archived)
The fuck is up with that, man.
Pneumostome! >:(
I hate those things. But the annotation above points out the snails anus, which is clearly closer to its brain than the lung, heart, liver, stomach, kidney and foot D:
Wait, scratch that last one.
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 3:08,
archived)
Wait, scratch that last one.
I have been ruined by team america
i read "herpaderp" and all my brain said in response was "muhammad jihad"
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 4:18,
archived)
In the plural that's "plummets" then
There aren't enough words to describe a gentleman with unusually small plums.
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 3:18,
archived)
i think your profile pic is missing a glass of orange juice and a croissant
*i'll be nice and not shop them on, but i can't be held responsible for any other b3tans actions*
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 3:10,
archived)
So long as the picture isn't also flipped horizontally we'll know which is the original
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 3:23,
archived)
Shirley Manson can't make music
Your maths is wrong
And Buffy was a whore
Books are ok though.
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 3:32,
archived)
And Buffy was a whore
Books are ok though.
I think you actually make a valid point about science
as you can see, using mathematics to explain something which is allready expressed in mathematics just digs us further and further away from reality. likewise, we can move backward through the same fractal explaining abstract concepts using everyday objects and closer and closer to real.
It is all inside itself and outside itself simultaneously.
Narim hassein explains this in his 'fractal universe' lectures; here
Though, he's not a scientist.
( ,
Sun 3 Jan 2010, 15:21,
archived)
It is all inside itself and outside itself simultaneously.
Narim hassein explains this in his 'fractal universe' lectures; here
Though, he's not a scientist.
Oh god, not him again.
As far as I can tell he's just doing his best to misunderstand and jam together random bits of science he's read. Probably while stoned.
Now for a REAL fractal universe theory check out Laurent Nottale and his "Scale Relativity".
( ,
Mon 4 Jan 2010, 21:05,
archived)
Now for a REAL fractal universe theory check out Laurent Nottale and his "Scale Relativity".