That's because the manager's special.
I think they could get away with the 'better than half price' claim as it;s just a matter of perspective.
also, yay snow day!
( ,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 10:14,
archived)
also, yay snow day!
"Better"
For Tesco!
Shall we report them to the moral police? What's with the manager special?
( ,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 10:16,
archived)
Shall we report them to the moral police? What's with the manager special?
Hang on a minute though
£3 is not less than half of £5.39 and therefore not better for the consumer wishing to save monies...they are doing it wrong. Manager must be special.
( ,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 11:16,
archived)
Half of £5.39
Would be £2.695
Which is a NONSENSE.
Clearly £3.00 is Better, both aesthetically and calculatorability-wise
( ,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 11:37,
archived)
Which is a NONSENSE.
Clearly £3.00 is Better, both aesthetically and calculatorability-wise
They mislabled the tuna offer from last month, three pack was £2 but two of them was £3 which was 6 for £3 (50p a can instead of £1+ hence better than half price). Money off AND a discount for bulk but this label seems to have conflated the two offers (past and current) and ended up incomprehensible.
( ,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 21:41,
archived)