probably not contagious
according to his physician test shows he no longer has active virus. monoclonal antibodies did the job I reckon
(, Tue 6 Oct 2020, 17:57, Reply)
(
MyFrontFellOff ; his mouth full of teddies, urinating defiantly, Tue 6 Oct 2020, 20:04,
Reply)
Can they test for active virus?
I thought that the test couldn’t determine whether the virus was active or dead, merely that it was present.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Tue 6 Oct 2020, 20:27,
Reply)
this is true and the answer is unknown
yet apparently he HAS tested negative for live virus so they must have some fancy ass test we don't know about. or his doctor misspoke or is lying
(, Tue 6 Oct 2020, 20:35, Reply)
The same doctor who announced his blood oxygen hadn't gone into the low 80's. Which is no denial that it was in the 80's - not exactly a great score.
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Tue 6 Oct 2020, 20:49,
Reply)
dunno, I got my info from the official report on his condition and what drugs he was on
By the way, Centers for Disease Control in the US have now confirmed that touching contaminated surfaces is not a main modality of spread for Covid-19. They say the main one is airborne transmission. . Seems like they didn't get your memo asking to Stop buying into and spreading that shit, the absolute spastics.
(, Tue 6 Oct 2020, 22:09, Reply)
ever going to admit you were wrong to say that?
didn't think so. wanker
(, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 9:49, Reply)
I'm not going to apologise for you wilfully misinterpreting what I said. And honestly, this has been going on for months. Get over it.
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 9:51,
Reply)
I'm not misinterpreting a damn thing
Let me ask you this: Do you now agree that contaminated surfaces are not a main modality of spread for Covid-19? yes, or no, or don't know, or no comment. which is it?
(, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 14:57, Reply)
I have already made my position on this perfectly clear here:
b3ta.com/links/1551917
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 16:16,
Reply)
exactly
no comment is the only possible answer you can give and have an intact ego.
(, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 19:12, Reply)
Fuck me - stop playing wiki-google-doctor
Viruses are neither dead nor alive. The are inactive when they are floating about in the air inside "The Beast" on a presidential drive-by or lying on the handrail of the steps up to Air force One. They become active when they come in contact with a nice moist host cell in the mouth, eyes, nasal cavity or lung. They only become inactive again when Trump shits them out with what's left of his 4th Big Mac of the day.
(
buffet_the_appetite_slayer ٩(●̮̃•)۶ jacked in to the ICE on, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 0:44,
Reply)
Viruses 'not being alive' is more of a philosophical claim than a biological fact.
It's a debate for simpler people to have because obviously viruses are alive.
(
brb man-child cuck corporate supplicant fuck, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 14:49,
Reply)
I said active not alive.
for that first comment and I understand they're not technically living things, I say live here to distinguish between 'working' and 'broken'. yes they are 'dead' things but they reproduce in our cells, at which point they are sort-of alive. not that I'm claiming to be an authority or expert on the matter. they don't have DNA do they? just RNA?. It seems the US have a test that show if the virus is in a state that it cannot infect living cells. call that what you will but I figure 'dead' does the job for simplicity's sake.
(, Wed 7 Oct 2020, 15:07, Reply)