b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1611221 | Random

This is a link post Questions

(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 15:18, Reply)
This is a normal post Is this the exam where I cheat by looking into the soul of the person next to me?

(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 15:42, Reply)
This is a normal post now is a bit variable
but it's under 300 milliseconds unless you arrange some quite specific situations, like Bose-Einstein condensates. Basically, you can stretch out now for as long as you can stop a superposition from collapsing, and even then only in the local area of the particle in a superposition.

Also, the set of all sets does contain itself, but does the set of all sets which do *not* contain themselves contain itself?
(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 18:02, Reply)
This is a normal post It's very fucking variable.
If you could instantly snapshot all the nows across the observable universe (accounting for every kind of time lag/latency) they would not all describe the same moment in terms of causality and the next tick of their quantum woo clocks would all diverge from each other according to local gravity, velocity and distance from each other. So there is no absolute now, only a fuzzy relative now, human perception of time is probably total bullshit, there are worlds out there where the sky is burning, where the sea's asleep and the rivers dream, people made of smoke and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice and somewhere else the tea is getting cold. Come on, Ace, we've got work to do.
(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 19:27, Reply)
This is a normal post "Now" is as long as it takes to say the word "Now"

(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 22:45, Reply)
This is a normal post
Yes, that's true actually
(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 21:30, Reply)
This is a normal post Russells paradox is about "the set of all sets that are NOT members of themselves"

(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 9:23, Reply)
This is a normal post I know
but the guy in the video only mentions the set of all sets and whether it contains itself, which, of course, it does. It seems he was trying to refer to Russel's paradox but got it wrong.
(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 11:12, Reply)
This is a normal post That reminds me, I need a haircut.

(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 12:54, Reply)
This is a normal post 'Oh no, not again'
This video does not help my overthinking.
(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 21:00, Reply)
This is a normal post i tend to think that "now" is another concept, like "purpose", that humans think is very important because that's the way our monkey brains have evolved
but that's because life itself is essentially a complicated form of causality, so we are incapable of experiencing reality as a continuum with past present and future all existing together where "now" has no intrinsic meaning beyond the ordinal position of that form in that continuum. That Einsteins relativism is the only way that we can accurately describe that reality, by its relation to other forms. There is no "hour" or "now", just an ordinal relationship of causality depending on the closeness of events and the observer. Therefore, I should not have to pay this parking ticket.
Sincerely
cumquat may
(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 23:22, Reply)
This is a normal post
I was just going to say that.
(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 1:16, Reply)
This is a normal post
youtu.be/nRGCZh5A8T4?si=Im_SSe1mGDoVsrgG
(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 23:34, Reply)
This is a normal post Excellent

(, Wed 6 Dec 2023, 23:59, Reply)
This is a normal post Yes, but when will then be now?

(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 10:01, Reply)
This is a normal post In the movie they say 'soon'
but that's when now will be then. Then will never be now again.
(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 11:18, Reply)
This is a normal post Fine. I’ll just go with Planck time because that sounds vaguely clever.
But if space isn’t quantised then why should time be?
No need to answer; that’s one of those questions where if you can understand the answer you wouldn’t have needed to ask the question in the first place.
(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 11:31, Reply)
This is a normal post 'Never' is quite a statement
given that negative mass is a plausible thing, and given that negative mass objects in motion behave as if they're time reversed, and given that observers moving at (or above) relativistic speeds would witness some causality-breaking effects when observing each other...

If time is an emergent quality of space, and space can be manipulated, I think it's plausible that we could arrange energy and mass in ways that allow for meaningful/useful time reversal.
(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 17:46, Reply)
This is a normal post How soon is now?

(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 15:41, Reply)
This is a normal post You go about things the wrong way.

(, Thu 7 Dec 2023, 15:53, Reply)
This is a normal post And you go home

(, Fri 8 Dec 2023, 19:08, Reply)
This is a normal post And you cry

(, Fri 8 Dec 2023, 19:09, Reply)
This is a normal post And you want to die

(, Fri 8 Dec 2023, 19:10, Reply)
This is a normal post That was a message on behalf of the Samaritans
- by Missery, from The Sulks.
(, Fri 8 Dec 2023, 19:12, Reply)