
I intended to go to bed at about 11, but I've been buried in this for the last couple of hours. Yes its subjective and misses some obvious ones, but it is stunningly researched and he's got to talk to the original creators on a surprising number of them.
/Geekgasm
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 0:49, Reply)

and Starbug and the Tardis? ffs... one was designed to look shit, and the other isn't even a spaceship.
and where is the one that looks like a set of boobs? forget the movie's name... pretty sure it was flown by John Boy Walton though... anyone?
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 6:23, Reply)

But I don't remember John Boy being in that!!
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 8:19, Reply)

...Battle Beyond the Stars. It's mentioned briefly in this entry.
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 8:20, Reply)

a spaceship that looks like a pair of boobs (however I don't think it shot from the nips, might be wrong...) fails to get into the top 75
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 12:24, Reply)

And if you'll notice its approaching each of the ships very much from a design aspect then I'd say Starbug is very successful. It was intended to look shit and does. Job done.
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 10:48, Reply)

it doesn't make my scooter a spaceship though... well, in my head it is sometimes...
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 12:22, Reply)

A whole new vein of inspiration :o)







EDIT No Defiant? Or any Bab 5 at all?
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 10:26, Reply)

Missing some obvious ones.
I could understand not including the Omega Destroyers as they're very similar design to the Leonov which is in there. No love for the Vorlons, Shadows or Minbari Cruisers seems a bit odd though.
Defiant? Well its pretty similar to the Enterprise variants which are covered in the Enterprise bit to be honest.
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:26, Reply)

Plenty of hyperlinked articles that will keep my geek-gland satisfied for the rest of the day.
Nice one
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:21, Reply)

Wait until you see the 18 foot long model of the Rodger Young...
( , Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:27, Reply)

Personally, as a kid I dreamed of flying an Eagle
( , Fri 4 Mar 2011, 0:39, Reply)