
At the bottom there is a ‘top team GB medalists’ segment.
First should be Ennis, or something like that…. Then scroll across to Christine ohurugo…
Im not sure if its actually her.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:00, Reply)

The contrast seems ok, but when I switch the' DV mode' what ever that is, I can see her. Before it was just a silouette such was the bad contrast.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:04, Reply)

But on my screen you cant see any face.
Bit of face palm about this post I think... deary me :(
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:14, Reply)

....I bet they all look the same on your screen dont they?
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:13, Reply)

it wasnt meant to come across racist, hence my carefully worder post...
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:17, Reply)

If I was ever racially abused with that term I would definitely laugh.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:23, Reply)

as i see it if a country gets 54 bronze medals, they finish higher than a country with 53 gold medals?
im confused.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:14, Reply)

Some count overall medals, some count gold
If two countries have the same number of gold, then i think its the number of medals.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:15, Reply)

If they are both equal then it moves to Bronze.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:22, Reply)

I was looking in to the earlier it seems that most countries count golds, if it even then they drop down to silver and then it that is still a tie then on to bronze. The merikans count total medals.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:24, Reply)

As China are leading whichever way you measure it, maybe they'll stop.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:30, Reply)

In your defense that is a terrible picture.
It's lost the top 20% if the white levels.
This is how it should look

( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:20, Reply)

as im still looking at it through the same monitor... its just another silouette
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 12:23, Reply)

...To something like 64 colours.
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 13:00, Reply)

My guess is on an un-calibrated screen.
Calibrate your screens people.....
( , Wed 8 Aug 2012, 13:04, Reply)