![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Often the things we look forward to the most turn out to be a huge let down. As Freddy Woo puts it, "High heels in bed? No fun at all. Porn has a lot to answer for."
Well, Freddy, you are supposed to get someone else to wear them.
What's disappointed you lot?
null points for 'This QOTW'
( , Thu 26 Jun 2008, 14:15)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The first time I saw one, I thought 'Why would I possibly want to put my willy in THAT?'
It's not stopped me from doing so, but the fact is that human genitalia is not really that attractive, is it?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:20, 51 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
so they're a wee bit like an artichoke or a pineapple. Fucking terrifying to look at but worth the struggle for the goodness inside - Yummy!
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:24, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
our reproductive organs are quite repulsive, but that's what light switches are for.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:26, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Your dicks are hardly one of mother nature's better designs.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:27, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
that pr0n is just two ugly things banging up against each other. AND I LOVE PR0N! This has to stop.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:28, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I disagree - it's a very good design, which allows peeing with (some) directional ability, then more interesting use when it stiffens up.
Except for the banjo string. I think that's one aspect that could be improved.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:30, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Note that I said 'Human genitals'.
Not specifically female ones.
But with my teenage hormones in full flow, I kind of expected the object of my desires to be, well, pretty.
Like a mural. Or a beautiful sunset.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:32, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
That's a US expression. Where I come from, we think it rather beautiful and try to do it often.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:33, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
In the right situation, they ALL look pretty damn good (male and female)
EDIT: OK, I read that and it doesn't look right. What I mean is both* partners genitalia look pretty good when you're getting down and dirty...
* or all 3 :)
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:34, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
For the lack of banjo string
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:35, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Higher risk of infection and decreased sensitivity? No ta.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:39, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Is it true that they have teeth?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:42, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Hygiene issues. Now if you make sure they're clean and dip em in a glass of something grape-y, they all taste good.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:42, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Decreased sensitivity? According to who? I've only once ever gotten a bladder infection and it's quite sensitive enough as it is. Sounds like a load of Pravda from the anti-circumcision lobbyists to me...
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:43, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
less chewey skin, was what I was thinking. I like your line of thought with the grape-y stuff though, especially if it's cold and fizzy.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:43, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You chew em? Don't fancy that much and fizzy may translate into stingy when applied to trouser flesh.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:45, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
And flavoured lubes make it feel as though your sucking on a lollypop : )
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:45, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
How do you know how sensitive it COULD be?
The thing is that the foreskin is there for a reason. It's a natural lubricating sheath that cleans and guards against infection. Why remove it (unless you need to for medical reasons)?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:45, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
MUCH lower risk of infection.
And knob-cheese.
And let's face it - a soupcon of decreased sensitivity can work in your (and your young fancy-woman's) favour, non?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:46, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
no, no chewing, but the temptation is always there, right under my nose.
The fizzy works just fine. Well, they never scream. Much.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:48, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Circumcision is not the norm in Britain. A couple of mates have had it done, and one told me that his "bell-end is like leather" now.
Not an attractive mental image.
And CHCB - given suitable cleaning, I wouldn't think there would be a difference in taste?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:48, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
or a snapped banjo string or any of the other things that I've heard tales of on here. And I don't think I'd want it to be more sensitive- premature ejaculation is something I'd prefer to avoid, if ya know what I mean...
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:49, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
although there's something more... er... palatable about a circumcised one. (That's based on a sample size of two without and a larger number with teh skin attached.)
Neither way made any difference whatsoever when mimsy-action commenced.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:52, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it should make fuck all difference really, no?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:53, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
And I do prefer circumcised now I've tried one.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:54, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Is your gaz inbox exploding yet with offers to increase the statistical significance of your survey?
*suppresses urge to gaz*
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:54, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I take my experiments very seriously. There would have to be strict controlled conditions.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 15:57, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Enjoy.
www.b3ta.com/questions/toomuchinformation/post89173
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:02, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You wouldn't suck an ice lolly without taking the paper off.
Hmmmm....
*considers circumcision*
*remembers Pooflake's story*
*decides against it*
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:06, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
As opposed to what kind of genitalia?
Is there some kind of sexy animal genitalia that we....
...wait...this is b3ta. I take that back.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:25, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
That actually made me laugh out loud. Haven't done that for a while, now my colleagues are remembering why they thought I was unbalanced in the first place. Cheers!
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:28, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
wondering if its because its had a sheltered life? Maybe a circumcised leather penis has its advantages
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:32, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
a bell-end like leather?
i never knew that would happen.
can it be polished to a proper patent level of shiny?
that would be worth having the op for.
do you think with effort, and a lot of time, you could shine it up like a conker?
That would scare my mrs, and would be well worth doing.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:33, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but I'm imagining it's more suede than patent.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:37, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i think i really want a conker cockend.
not sure how to go about it now.
@k2k6 you should really ask your mate if it is conker-ous and check his expression carefully. it may give the whole game away. i think there is more to this than he is telling
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:39, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i am going to wait for autumn, hollow out a real conker and place it on before sexytime and see if she notices.
if that entertains me enough i may go for a permanent conker.
i would also be able to say "hung like a horse (chestnut)" and be truthful
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:41, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it would be dry when he was in my presence.
I was speaking to him last night, but never thought to ask that particular question, funnily enough.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:42, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Cutting off your lace curtain seems about as sensible as cutting off your eyelids. Yes, there's nowhere for nasties to accumulate, but on the other hand the important bit that's supposed to be covered ends up all dried up and weathered...
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 16:44, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
They both involve lopping off sensitive chunks of anatomy in the name of magic (by which I mean religion and the 'but it's unhygienic' argument, which I must attribute to magic as it certainly makes no rational sense. If so, the human race would have died out in great sweeping plagues of cock-rot and mimsy-mange by now.)
Female circumcision is seen as such a taboo whilst the male equivalent is seen as a joke because, with the latter:
- we're more familiar with it in the West.
- it's usually done to babies who have forgotten the pain by the time they're able to complain.
- it doesn't fit in with the whole 'men = oppressobastards' thing.
If I had been circumcised, I'd have sued the still-warm arse off of everyone involved by now. I haven't got much in this world, but at least I still come (f'narr!) with all my original bits and pieces.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 17:13, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Good work moglin.
My theory is "it's there for a reason, it's part of me, so leave it the fuck alone".
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 17:21, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Not had a single infection since I got it removed, used to get alot before though...
Damn phimosis.
They reckon it gives you a little bit more resistance to the HIV virus since it doesn't have the receptors anymore. On that note, I wouldn't test out that theory.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:43, closed)
« Go Back