B3TA fixes the world
Moon Monkey says: Turn into Jeremy Clarkson for a moment, and tell us about the things that are so obviously wrong with the world, and how they should be fixed. Extra points for ludicrous over-simplification, blatant mis-representation, and humourous knob-gags.
( , Thu 22 Sep 2011, 12:53)
Moon Monkey says: Turn into Jeremy Clarkson for a moment, and tell us about the things that are so obviously wrong with the world, and how they should be fixed. Extra points for ludicrous over-simplification, blatant mis-representation, and humourous knob-gags.
( , Thu 22 Sep 2011, 12:53)
« Go Back
Ban anyone (especially people in sports/reality TV,any sort of competition) from saying they plan on giving 110%.
It is physically impossible to give more than 100%, so cut it the fuck out.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 12:32, 11 replies)
At the end of the day
you need to avoid clichés like the plague.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 12:54, closed)
you need to avoid clichés like the plague.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 12:54, closed)
A week ago it was 'physically impossible' for anything to exceed the speed of light
But that all seems to have gone down the shitter now, doesn't it :P
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 13:14, closed)
But that all seems to have gone down the shitter now, doesn't it :P
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 13:14, closed)
What if you make a bet with a quid and get 2 quid and ten pence back from the bookie, don't you end with 110% profit? I'll take the 10p if you don't want it. I heard of a bookie giving great odds...
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 13:46, closed)
That's not the same though is it?
In terms of effort put in, the maximum anyone can give is 100%. It's a finite amount representing the most possible.
Giving 110% means giving more than is physically possible, therefore a ridiculous statement.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 13:57, closed)
But what if they normally only give 80%?
So an athlete works to a level of effort which over the course of the event works out to a mean effort of 80%. Sometimes they will be at full-stretch, and sometimes they will be waiting for something to happen.
We might see approximately a normal distribution of effort with mean at 80% and a standard deviation of 7%.
Now if you increase the mean effort to 110% of their usual level, their mean effort would be 88% (with the standard deviation about 5%).
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 15:21, closed)
So an athlete works to a level of effort which over the course of the event works out to a mean effort of 80%. Sometimes they will be at full-stretch, and sometimes they will be waiting for something to happen.
We might see approximately a normal distribution of effort with mean at 80% and a standard deviation of 7%.
Now if you increase the mean effort to 110% of their usual level, their mean effort would be 88% (with the standard deviation about 5%).
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 15:21, closed)
wouldn't be much of an athlete
if he only usually gave 80%. the lazy cunt.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 15:28, closed)
if he only usually gave 80%. the lazy cunt.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 15:28, closed)
100% would be the most they are physically able to give. The extra 10% comes from performance enhancing drugs.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:48, closed)
No, you can never make 100% (or more) profit unless the item cost nothing in the first place.
You're thinking of markup.
I buy something for £1, sell it for £2 that's 100% markup, 50% profit.
*I think, am a tad pissed
( , Wed 28 Sep 2011, 20:38, closed)
You're thinking of markup.
I buy something for £1, sell it for £2 that's 100% markup, 50% profit.
*I think, am a tad pissed
( , Wed 28 Sep 2011, 20:38, closed)
Yes, fucking, yes! It really disproportionatey pisses me off when I hear this shit. You cannot do it. You can only do it when comparing 2 or more factors "I'm going to give %110 effort compared to cunt#1" would be fine. But it never is.
( , Mon 26 Sep 2011, 21:03, closed)
« Go Back