b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1096378 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I just found out that the opposite of a quark is a squark
then I learn that the LHC is getting close to proving they don't exist. It's been an emotional rollercoaster
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:45, 4 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Interesting link
www.boingboing.net/2011/02/22/what-happens-when-yo-6.html
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:50, Reply)
woah

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:53, Reply)
I know!
I now want to put more things into particle beams!
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:56, Reply)
let's build one!
what goes in it first?
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:02, Reply)
Chompy!
Then, a sandwich, some grass, glass, ice-cream, matches, lipsalve and a wig.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:04, Reply)
how about a balloon full of custard?
and an old TV (the ones with vacuums in)
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:07, Reply)
Wut?
I've been telling everyone how cool quarks are and now they don't exist. That's me looking stupid.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:51, Reply)
quarks exist just not necessarily squarks
t.co/rW3Ag0Z

I had a hamster called quark once, and another called neutrino.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:53, Reply)
Quarks exist, squarks probably don't.

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:53, Reply)
Oh! that's ok then.

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:54, Reply)
I think the "We've been looking hard and can't find it, so it doesn't exist."
way of going about things is a bit suspect. It should be "We have found every possible combination of particles which seems to explain all known possibilities, and can I have a lolly now please?" type of statement before they give up.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:53, Reply)
I don't think they are giving up
so much as wedgying supersymmetry
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:55, Reply)
It's not that simple obviously.
The can infer the properties of a particle before finding it. If they then put an experiment in place that will create the particle and detectors that can detect the properties, then run it for months and nothing comes up, it's time to look back at the theory.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:56, Reply)
My head hurts.

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:00, Reply)
amazing what you learn at paperclip school

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:01, Reply)
Well duh.
It was more a comment on the simplified way that CERN are communicating with the media. I suppose I could buy New Scientist to find out, but it is so boring.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:01, Reply)
new scientist is cool
and has pretty pictures for us dumb artists
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:02, Reply)

ti t e
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:04, Reply)
I guess the fact that this took me ages to get
proves your point :(
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:06, Reply)
it has to be simplified
journalists are mostly stupid, people are mostly even more stupid than that. Things need to be dumbed down.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:04, Reply)
I know, I find it a shame though
There should be telly and radio for smart people, and our vote should count twice at elections and that.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:09, Reply)
Smart people don't sit and wait for knowledge to be handed to them.

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:09, Reply)
What can I say, I'm a lazy underachieving person.
Like most people here I should think.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:12, Reply)
Some people are smart at some things and not others
there are some things I will try and find out about, others I will find out about by accident, other things I will ignore until someone tells me in idiot language
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:13, Reply)
CERN's website is actually brilliant, and they're very good at talking to the media
the problem is most reporters dropped science at GCSE
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:07, Reply)
You can use Quark instead of Philadelphia on Slimming World but it sucks

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:16, Reply)
Haha.

(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:23, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1