b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1099535 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm not so sure about that, lets see:
EDIT - Poll Now Closed
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:26, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
pfft

(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:27, Reply)
needs a "both" column
it's possible to be a rapist AND a cunt, for example.
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:28, Reply)
is it therefore possible to be a rapist and not a cunt?

(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:31, Reply)
you need a philosopher for that sort of existential question
where's labs?
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:34, Reply)
wankathon

(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:34, Reply)
Lazy cunt
Can he not type with the other hand?
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:39, Reply)
I'm here, just emailed a lawyer and idly job hunting
"is it therefore possible to be a rapist and not a cunt?"

Think of it like two Venn diagrams for the possibilities of rapist and cuntitude:

In one viewpoint we have one big circle to represent Cuntitude, and a smaller circle wholly within this, like a cancerous nipple, representing Rapism. This would be the viewpoint of all rapists are cunts.

The other viewpoint would have the same big Cuntitude circle, but this time the Rapism circle sticks out the side, like a tumor. This covers the viewpoint that some rapists are cunts, but not all.

Now logic doesn't really factor into this, we'd have to base our conclusions on scientific data and/or anecdotal evidence. Like with most, if not all scientific theories, they can be proven by a singular example (rigorously and independently tested, of course).

Therefore, name me one rapist who is NOT a cunt, and you have your answer.
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:44, Reply)
Of course I could have put forward a more psychological argument
That assessed if any degree of Cuntitude was necessary for a rape to take place, and if there could be rape without a single ounce of Cunt being present within the rapist.

Or I could have argued more Philosophically and questioned whether an actor 'raping' another actor in a film (with various degrees of 'realism', from your average 18 rated film up to the hardcore violent stuff that Monty's trying to talk Dutch Schteve into trying out) qualifies as rape, and if so would the presence of a quick handshake and "good work there" comment at the conclusion of filming show a lack of cuntitude.
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:50, Reply)
wow
i am very impressed with the depth of erudite thought and learning that has gone into this.

*pants melt off*
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:54, Reply)
I am impressed with the levels of sarcasm here
To be honest, I just bullshitted and waffled on. Like a true philosopher.
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:57, Reply)
OMG! You've met Enzyme?

(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 12:00, Reply)
Lollerskates
I have, but didn't get chance to speak to him.
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 12:01, Reply)
Alright own up
who is clicking the "Something Else" button.
(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:48, Reply)
there's one rather obvious candidate who stands out, al

(, Mon 28 Feb 2011, 11:54, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1