
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Going to London for the weekend to do the big demo. This, I would look forward to enough, but it also means I get to meet up with loads of people *AND* see BB three weeks earlier than I thought I was going to.
Alt: I loathe prog music.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 8:58, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

But this one has a main TUC march with lots of feeder marches as well as other direct action. It's going to be huge.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:03, Reply)

I'm doing one of the feeders and then the UKUncut action on Oxford St.
www.ukuncut.org.uk/
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:06, Reply)

( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:06, Reply)

However, the way that the deficit is being reduced by harming the poorest in society is both unnecessary and unfair, and could be handled in an entirely different manner. For example, allowing public schools to have 'charitable' status means that we lose out on approximately £130 million in taxes per year.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:09, Reply)

inconveniencing millions and costing the nation hundreds of thousands of pounds in policing bills and in lost productivity at a time when the country hasn't got any fucking money is
a) going to produce any results whatsoever and
b) isn't actually making a bad situation worse by squandering resources?
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:14, Reply)

You're completely right, nobody should ever protest if it's going to inconvenience someone. Sorry about that, I'll just stay here and accept the ideological assault on the poor and disadvantaged.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:17, Reply)

(massive, wealthy organisations who pay their staff enormous salaries - very 'up the workers' I'm sure you agree) will of course be paying for the required police cover, won't they?
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:21, Reply)

Which is going to cost between £20-40 million, I might add, and will also harm productivity and shut down London. Even more so because of the insistence on a bank holiday.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:22, Reply)

That's what I would call a good investment personally
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:24, Reply)

that the majority of people in this country want.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:26, Reply)

The £20-40 million figure I gave was for policing and security alone. I'm fairly sure lost productivity on the bank holiday and the preceeding weekend will inflate the sum much, much higher. Along with all the clever people's insistence on taking three days holiday afterwards.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:29, Reply)

( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:32, Reply)

But that level of absenteeism all at once will surely also harm productivity, no? So according to Monty's argument, people shouldn't do it.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:39, Reply)

I'm totally on the fence and could argue for both sides as although no one is right, no one is wrong.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:03, Reply)

Why not have some sort of cyber protest, you could all meet up in WoW and totally get in the way of the Goblin Express and the castle of Grayskull
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:21, Reply)

just so your mates in business and the banks can make even more cash at a time when the country hasn't got any fucking money is
a) not going to produce any results whatsoever,
b) actually making a bad situation worse by squandering resources and
c) actually incredibly cuntish behaviour?
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:21, Reply)

a: lazy
b: feckless
c: stupid
d:all of the above
So why prop up a failing area of society, it's anti Darwinism
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:23, Reply)

Not leeching off society by being either:
a) born obscenely rich (and having your family avoid tax to make sure you don't lose a single penny),
b) a banker (and avoiding tax WHILST getting taxpayer funded bailouts when you fuck up) or
c) a business magnate (who conveniently actually lives in a post box somewhere in the middle of the Indian Ocean)
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:27, Reply)

is holding central London to ransom whilst a load of inflammatory tosspots with megaphones chant tedious rhetoric going to make the slightest bit of difference to the taxation and banking situations in this country?
I put it to you that you will achieve nothing whatsoever other than massive wastage of public money - unless you count fucking up struggling retail businesses that are already having a bad time (the FAT CAT BASTARDS) and generally pissing off innocent citizens.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:32, Reply)

Or more than the disabled people who are having their benefits fucked about with and removed for no good reason?
Or the children who will struggle in the future because their education was so fucked up, for no good reason?
Or the people who won't be treated properly because the NHS has been fucked about with so much, for no good reason?
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:37, Reply)

will help? Unless it works as well as the student protests!
Oh, wait.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:39, Reply)

is the banks will say 'hey - we're really sorry! Here's loads of our salaries to spend on flids! Now we've seen people vandalising shops we realise the errors of our ways!'
That's is what will definitely happen.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:44, Reply)

Throe money at a problem. When questioned in the commons why the NHS was failing in an area, or scholls were failing children their response was, "Well we've increase investment by £Xbn".
Brilliant, but if those billions made no difference to the lavels of care etc availible then they were wasted. Money is not the answer, efficiecny, quality and itleeligent running of services is the answer, this will never happed whilst budgets continue to rise.
If my boss questioned me on why a project had failed and I said, "yes it failed, but I pumped shit loads of extra money into it" I'd be fired, and rightly so.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:42, Reply)

My argument is that shafting the 'little people' while your mates make off with obscene amounts of cash and you lie and tell them that the cuts are necessary is fucking morally abhorrent.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:44, Reply)

to pay for jobs that aren't required to employ people who will then vote for you is morally abhorrent.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:47, Reply)

( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:51, Reply)

But the Labour governemnt propped up growth with borrowing during a time of global growth when the country should have been saving (Not selling all of our gold at a historically low price).
Save in the good times, so that you are prepared for the bad times. The recession would have happned either way, but we would have been in a better postion to ride it out and less cuts would have been necessary.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:57, Reply)

I don't disagree with you wholly, especially not about the gold. However, my point was originally that there are alternatives to the wholesale 'slash and burn the public sector then piss on it' approach of this government.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:01, Reply)

I don't consider that i earn a huge amount of money, but when my baby is born in August guess waht the governemnt will give me to help out...that's right absolutely nothing which is all I've ever been eligable for and all I would ever take as I have some pride.
And yet I pay almost £1000 a month in direct income tax and NI, a big chunk of which pays for pikey fucking twats to breed little shits up and down this fetid Isle.
My point is the people you are moaning about are a tiny minority, and your ideals filter down and fuck up the lives of the hard working, high tax paying middle classes, so just leave it out, alwight!
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:35, Reply)

Tgere are people who have gambled and grafted at the right times in their life.
And those people generally help many on their way.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:39, Reply)

acting like a selfish cunt simply because you believe someone else is acting like a selfish cunt is incredibly cuntish behaviour.
There's a brilliant way of making sure your opinions are heard. They're known as 'elections'.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:25, Reply)

And with a system that doesn't favour the majority? Yeah, stellar choice that.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:29, Reply)

Sorry if the democratic process doesn't favour your minority opinions because they are...y'know...minority.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:34, Reply)

I vote Labour, and broadly agree with their stance on most things.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:38, Reply)

Bravo, why not do everyone a favour and stay at home rolling around on the floor or whatever it is that you usually do
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:43, Reply)

Now, whilst I commend your ability to learn and repeat a trite phrase, I think you'll find that the public cuts have been necessitated due to the failings of a global financial market which rewarded idiocy with taxpayer money. Do run along now, wouldn't want you to get a headache by thinking too hard.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:47, Reply)

Especially as the tax receipts were lubbly jubbly. Hey look at us we're continuing to fuck more money up the wall year on year with the nhs. VOTE FOR US !!11! You may have noticed this if you hadn't been so busy rolling round on the floor.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:52, Reply)

So exactly what are the government now doing if not making it worse?
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:56, Reply)

No amount of mannequin theft or drinking diamond white on a day out in London is going to prevent it. I just wish all you pikeys would go to somewhere like Bradford and fuck that place up as opposed to annoying me in London.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:01, Reply)

And not only did we manage to pay it off with relatively little fuss, we also managed to set up a welfare state in the years after it?
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:03, Reply)

And that was on favourable terms, not the commercial terms we are borrowing on now.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:08, Reply)

Hopefully you get kicked in the cunt by a charging police horse, when it all inevitably gets 'out of hand'
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:09, Reply)

"I don't actually have an argument, so I'll just engage in extreme fuckwittitude".
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:12, Reply)

Think about it, agmonst the great unwashed are plenty of people who seem to know what they're talking about... Doctors and stuff, not just wanky people who are doing qthier damndest to avoid doing what their parents did; get a job and contribute to society.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:14, Reply)

Other than an easy ticket, and a day out on the piss in that London boring people with their commie opinions. They can fuck right off.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:21, Reply)

that's a fairly stupid argument.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:46, Reply)

and you can't go into the Reichstag anymore unless you register a week in advance. But it was still good fun.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:07, Reply)

though they are not as efficiant as national stereotypes would have us believe. In some cafes we waited for over five minutes to get a coffee.
They did all speak english though, which was useful as my German isn't great, but also a bit annoying as I was trying to improve my german and they kept answering in either really fast german which I couldn't understand, or slow english, like I was slightly retarded.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:12, Reply)

won't cost the taxpayer vast sums to police.
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 10:04, Reply)

I'm all for the cuts, but only if they still need the money after Tescos and their ilk pay what they morally should
( , Mon 21 Mar 2011, 9:33, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread