This guy's got bad form.
He predicted the end of the world in 1994 and it remained resolutely un-ended. For the second time in as many decades, this guy's going to look like a right cunt.

I'm not hiding in the fallout shelter just yet.
( Kroney, Fri 20 May 2011, 10:42, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

Calculation error last time apparently

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Fri 20 May 2011, 10:44, Reply)

Sanity error both times.

( Kroney, Fri 20 May 2011, 10:46, Reply)

Needs MOAR QA

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Fri 20 May 2011, 10:46, Reply)

Geek time
IF "%WORLD%" == "END" GOTO i_told_you_so
IF "%WORLD%" NEQ "END" GOTO err_fucking_tit
( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Fri 20 May 2011, 10:48, Reply)

ha ha ha
*kills self*
( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Fri 20 May 2011, 10:51, Reply)

What kind of crazy-ass language is that?

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 20 May 2011, 11:00, Reply)

DOS

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Fri 20 May 2011, 11:01, Reply)

+ TRES, QUATRO
dududududu-dududududu...S-EXPRESS
( Bill Clay a.k.a. Claudio, Fri 20 May 2011, 11:07, Reply)

You realise that there's 3 decades, not two, right?

( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Fri 20 May 2011, 11:16, Reply)

1991 - 2001 - 2011
two.

Also, I'm 30 and was born in 1980.
( Kroney, Fri 20 May 2011, 11:17, Reply)

"In as many decades"
1990's - 2000's - 2010's

He made no incorrect prediction between January 1st 2000 and December 31st 2009 (or 2001/2010 for those that prefer it)
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Fri 20 May 2011, 11:38, Reply)

I don't really want to argue this round and around with you because it's pointless.
I will just repeat that between 1991 and 2001 was a decade. Between 2001 and 2011 is two. That is the way it was meant and it is worded correctly for that purpose. A decade is a period of ten years, that is all.
( Kroney, Fri 20 May 2011, 11:49, Reply)