b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1337527 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Gypseys/travellers are scum, and I say this not from a hysterical Daily Mail reading point of view
but from one of experience.

They should be forcibly removed and their assets seized to pay the landowner compensation.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:43, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
They do actually own the land.
They just had no legal rigt to build on it.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:44, Reply)
Well then they can live there in tents
i really don't see why we afford them the rights that we do, everyone knows they are thieving gits/cowboy builders/land thieves/tax dodgers etc etc...
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:46, Reply)
it's because they are a reasonable sized group of people
saying "no" if they are told to do something. There's fuck all anyone can actually do about that.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:48, Reply)
I'm with you up to a point.
It's complicated by the fact that some of the development is legal, so they are not trying to move that part, just the illegal part. But they are claiming this will split up families.

I still think fuck 'em. Move them all into the legal part and let them sleep four to a bed if they must and they can stay for all I care. But I don't see why they should get special treatment to have retrospective permission that has already been declined granted to live in the bits they shouldn't have built in the first place.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:50, Reply)
And while we're at it, what about those jews, blacks, women and gays?

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:50, Reply)
OK, 'retard' (which is all I originally said) was a bit harsh
but that's such a 'rediculous' argument that I can't be bothered to engage on it.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:51, Reply)
If your starting point is a fundemental difference between one set of people and another
then yeah your argument isn't worth starting.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:53, Reply)
Good job that isn't my argument then isn't it.

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:55, Reply)
You do know I replied to a thread that called them all "thieving gits/cowboy builders/land thieves/tax dodgers etc etc"
And my point was that saying that is, in my opinion, just as grossly disgusting as saying it about any other group of people. And if I hear "It's not all of them, I'm sure a lot of them are fine, it's just the ones I've delt with" then, well, I ordered a zinger tower burger from KFC the other week and it didn't have any zinger sauce, I'm not saying _all_ black people want to cheat me out of what I've paid money for, I'm not saying _all_ black people are trying to cheat me, and this one _isn't_ representitive of them all, it just gave them a bad name.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:59, Reply)
No, you replied to my point.
If you want to reply to Al, reply to Al.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:03, Reply)
ummm, no he didn't
he replied directly to Ape's post, which is the one he refers to
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:04, Reply)
Oops.
I stand corrected.

Apologies. I'll just go and pick these toys up now.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:05, Reply)
Such a spastic.

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:11, Reply)
It's been said before.

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:12, Reply)
What?

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:53, Reply)
don't know why we didn't think of it before
CHiPs
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:54, Reply)
Hoummus and Away

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:19, Reply)
Bratzwurst

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:24, Reply)
Desperate House Wine

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:24, Reply)
Invader Zimfandel

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:30, Reply)
COPOUT ALERT!!!!!!!

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 13:55, Reply)
Oh FFS
OK, my point is that half the people there have no legal right to be there and they have built a community in the full knowledge of this. They are now crying it's unfair to split up that community. Well fuck that, they should have built it legally.

There are many places in and around the area where there are legal sites for travellers. They have been offered options that they have refused to take, so it's reached where it is now.

I have no problem with them as people, and I've already said that actually, one of their legal options would be nearer to where I live than where they currently are and I would still be happy for them to settle there. (so I am not sure where Rory got his NIMBY claim from).

It's not like Laindon/Wickford/Pitsea are full of upright members of the community themselves but they do at least by and large live where they are legally entitled to, and I'm certainly not judging the travelling community as being 'scum' or worth less than any body else. They just should not be where they are under the current law and have always known this, so I'm not about to get all pussy liberal in their defence.

but to leap from that viewpoint to a 'what about the jews' is a whiny, ill thought out knee jerk reaction that isn't really worth the time I have just spent responding to.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:02, Reply)
the thing about the jews etc. wasn't in response to you
it was in response to Ape's comment about them all being tax dodgers etc.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:04, Reply)
yeah, I've just picked up on that.
Apologies all round.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:06, Reply)
one last thing and that will be the end of it
*belms*
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:09, Reply)
You're the kind of cunt who puts up a conservatory in a conservation area and sticks two fingers up at THE MAN

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:06, Reply)
I don't really give a fuck but thanks for the effort.
I hope you look back on that minute of your life and consider it a wasted one.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:06, Reply)
Just so you know how this place works, when you get a thread, the reply to it is the one under it and a bit nudged on to the right.
I was replying to the comment "everyone knows they are thieving gits/cowboy builders/land thieves/tax dodgers etc etc." that a lot of people here actually believe.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:07, Reply)
I've apologised twice now.
I think that's probably sufficient.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:07, Reply)
That's alright, also, just so you know, posts don't instantly appear, you have to refresh the page.
When I typed my reply to you your appologise wern't on my screen. No need to be uppity about it.
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:09, Reply)
I apologise for my apology....

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:13, Reply)
Jeeves & Wooster(shire sauce)

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:09, Reply)
Lock Stock and Two Smoked Kippers.

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:19, Reply)
that's not a tv show!
FAIL
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:21, Reply)
Yes it was.
www.imdb.com/title/tt0243714/
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:22, Reply)
Quornblower

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:27, Reply)
Mince behaving badly.

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:28, Reply)
Studio 60 on the Chicken Strips

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:30, Reply)
The West Buffalo Wings.

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:30, Reply)
Seed-y:UK

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:31, Reply)
My Family (bucket)

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:32, Reply)
(miniature) Heroes

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:30, Reply)
a good pun
and a very strange mental image
(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:28, Reply)
Who wants to be a Scallionaire

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:33, Reply)
The Jeremy Kale Show

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:33, Reply)
River Cottage Pie.

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:34, Reply)
Chives & Wooster

(, Wed 31 Aug 2011, 14:20, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1