Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Alt:
Ben Harp: NO! No no no no no no NO! Let me tell you what you've produced... Over the last two weeks, you two have produced exactly squat! SQUAT! During which time the ex-presidents have robbed two more banks. Now for Christ's sake, does either one of you have anything even remotely interesting to tell me?
[brief pause]
Johnny Utah: I caught my first tube today... Sir.
Altaltalt: Open Water - the protagonists are odious, the story slow and dull and in the end no-one even gets eaten by a shark!
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:19, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:21, Reply)
Except the reality was the skipper of the dive boat realised what he'd done eventually and went back to find them.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:33, Reply)
it's based on something that happened off the Barrier Reef in Oz. Couple were left behind, they only realised days later when they hadn't been seen back at their hotel/campsite (can't remember which). No-one knows what happened to them. Apparently their flotation vests turned up months later undamaged which suggests "not eaten by sharks" but, who knows? The barrier reef is 60 miles off shore, they hardly swam back on their own.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:40, Reply)
when noone knew what had happened.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:44, Reply)
although I think we can safely assume it didn't end well for them.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:44, Reply)
they made a fucking sequel? of a film based on a true story which couldn't have a more terminal ending if it tried?
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:44, Reply)
Different people, they all jump off their boat to go swimming but forget to put the ladder down, they then spend the rest of the film squabbling, failing to get back into the boat and either getting killed or killing each other (there are 4 in this one), as before none of them are likeable.
It was also ruined for my by the fact that given their resources I could have been back in that boat in about 10 minutes.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:54, Reply)
Anchor rope. Climb. Job done.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 14:05, Reply)
is the gratuitous tit and minge shot at the start of the film.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:31, Reply)
Then they could have called it 'Nork and Mingie'.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:36, Reply)
I also liked it when they died
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:38, Reply)
is the audiences worry for their safty. i would have wlaked out of the screening if i hadn't fallen asleep
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:45, Reply)
I saw it on telly a couple of years ago.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:47, Reply)
I think you're thinking of Sex and The City actually.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:42, Reply)
Also, I'd like to see a remake of The Godfather and have that bloke wake up and find Sarah Jessica Parker's head in his bed.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:44, Reply)
but i was having my hair done for a lunchtime treat/tonight's activities.
this seems to relate to your opinion on my lovely feel-good movies, somehow....
although ACTUALLY the book of cocktail is very dark and depressing, all about drug addiction and losers, and the original script for pretty woman, called $3,000, is TOTALLY different to the actual film that was made. for a start, edward is a cheating swearing guy and they both take drugs and... well it's much darker. so it must be the backers who are saying, hmmm, we can make this film if we just make it fluffy...
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 13:58, Reply)
Instant shite. Unless it's so bad it's unwittingly genius, see "Top Gun"
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 14:07, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread