b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1425934 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

some people just are fucking odd
i think the whole quentin/parrot/horse thing is weird, but it's better than the baldmonkey two-hats fake fight. now that's an exercise in pointlessness right there.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:48, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
I think you and I are the only ones who can't see the Emporer's new clothes.

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:49, Reply)
it's our strong northern roots
i suspect the parrot might be gilgamesh because it's actually quite well written and funny underneath the squawking. the rest is just blithering shite!
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:51, Reply)
It's not gilgy, it's probably Wormulus.

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:53, Reply)
he's not usually around at night though...

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:57, Reply)
Are you stalking him?

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:58, Reply)
I thinnk BM Vs TH was great fun
real or not, much the way I feel about QOTW answers, truth is secondary to entertainment value.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:57, Reply)
yeah but it didn't have any of that either!

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:58, Reply)
These things are relative
I was entertained, therefore, for me it was entertaining, you clearly weren't therefore, you are clearly a humourless old harridan, innit?
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:01, Reply)
i don't think bm could amuse me
if he slipped naked on a banana skin, his pants fell off on the way down, he landed in a steaming dog turd, thrashed around in it for a bit, then died. whilst telling jokes.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:07, Reply)
Well, basically
www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1425969
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:08, Reply)
It was strange to see so many people get upset about it.

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:52, Reply)
I think we're more non-plussed than upset.
Or do you mean on /talk?
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:53, Reply)
Yes, sorry it was a /talk thing.

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:57, Reply)
The other two irritated me. Cunthorse and his mate.

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:54, Reply)
i only had a quick skim over a link someone posted because i was bored on the tube
but it looked totally and utterly faked to me.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:56, Reply)
Of course it was but I enjoyed joining in anyway.

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:59, Reply)
so knowing that the other person is faking it
is no bar to you enjoying yourself?
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:47, Reply)
I was quite impressed with the fact that so many of his 'friends'
had no problem with the idea that he was a fat, dildo* stealing ballbag.

* Yes, swipey, I know
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 9:59, Reply)
Have you seen any videos of BM?

(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:00, Reply)
Well, yes.
Point, but still, he seemed less popular than I'd expected.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:05, Reply)
I like BM, if I'm being honest.
And he has pulled a lot of shit in the past.
When his marriage broke up, lost his job....
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:07, Reply)
I see nothing particularly likable about any of this.
I think at best he peobably meeds a good shrink or some better pills, and at worst he's just a fat needy spastic, of which we have an ample supply, but then again it's all personal taste, I'm sure some people describe me in just the same way, probably a bit les of the fat though.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:10, Reply)
And I reckon that level of upset at some pointless internet is what amuses him.
Different strokes and all that. In the grand scheme of things there are far worse. Bou, syncubus, wombat. To name but a few.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:15, Reply)
Again, we see the problem of text only communication.
I'm genuinely not upset by him, when he's being himself I find him tedious and unfunny but not annoying. In his PH incarnation I found him irritating because he fucked up the thread structure here while remaining epically unfunny, but I agree he's not worth getting upset over.Mostly either pitiable or irritating depending on mood.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:19, Reply)
Fair enough. I wasn't trying to pick on you, by the way,
I just think the insults (not just you) show a level of quite bothered. Banter is one thing but actual insults are another. Aren't we all a bit needy here? Otherwise we probably wouldn't bother posting.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:24, Reply)
S'fine
I suppose it's the difference between genuine insults and comedically exaggerated internet insults. There are a few people on here I genuinely dislike, but very few(and if you post asking who, you automatically become one of them) but he's not one, glad he's stopped spamming over here though, that was annoying.

Some are more needy than others, but point taken and I agree.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2011, 10:31, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1