Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
without massive pension reform that won't happen as all the public sector workers have a cry and refuse to go to work if they don't get what they want.
*stamps foot, cries until sick, goes out on strike*
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:30, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
it's not predictable. It's just a message that suits the current government.
You want to bail a country out of a financial crisis? Try a) raising taxes, because there's not one single good reason for not doing that and b) stop fighting fucking wars in other people's countries.
Right now you have a financial crisis created by a downturn in the global markets. That was in turn caused by stupendously idiotic banking practicies (private sector) and then maintained by stupid economic practices/failure to ever fucking collect tax in various eurozone countries. Not because public sector pensions are quite good.
This government targets the public sector because it wants to, and because it wants to break the unions - and specifically because they know that a large proportion of the chattering Mail classes will support them because they are too stupid to see it as anything other than a "but NOT FAIR they have more pension than me" issue.
Not because it makes any sense or because there is any sound economic reason behind it.
And bear in mind, as Al will testify, I don't like unions and I do think the public sector should contribute more to their pension, and I still think Osborne is a fucktard and his policies are idiotic and insane.
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:43, Reply)
This has happened before and it will happen again and it's not just about banks as such.
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:50, Reply)
But in general, absolutely, I agree. but the cost of public sector pensions had nothing to do with it, and isn't a relevant way to get out of it. That was my point
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:53, Reply)
If you have banks listed as private companies then this whole thing will happen all over again. That is a separate discussion though.
The pension problem has little to do with this however. The simple solution is to execute people once they reach retirement. This will also mean people spend more during their lives rather than save and will further stimulate the economy. IAM GENIUZ!
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:58, Reply)
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 18:01, Reply)
REVOLUTION!
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 18:03, Reply)
As one of the party officials you will have all these things, as is only right.
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:58, Reply)
a) Apart from the laffer curve, and the fact that all but the top 5% or so of people are squeezed to hell anyway. Sure, a 60% rate foe earnings over 200k wont hurt in the short term though, but such thinks are not desirable.
b) In complete agreement
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:52, Reply)
I would tit-punch Jordan too, to see if my hand broke.
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:56, Reply)
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 18:04, Reply)
Lorainne Kelly.
Any underwear model from early 90's catalogues.
TORI AMOS!!!!! of fuck me, what I wouldn't give for that.
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 18:05, Reply)
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 18:12, Reply)
and therefore why is it fair to squeeze them more?
(, Tue 29 Nov 2011, 17:55, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread