Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
They saw an opportunity for some publicity and took it and made themselves look like fools
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:37, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
She was so militant that even though she made some fair points she had lost before she started the pension debate.
With her angry red face and little piggy eyes.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:44, Reply)
it couldn't have been your mum.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:50, Reply)
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:53, Reply)
The man's a deliberate parody of himself.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:51, Reply)
there are a lot of people who aren't aware of this. It's the same as Daily Mail columnists, it doesn't matter if they are fucking cunts, or just people clever enough to realise that by writing like a cunt people will pay you money (which still makes them cunts in my book).
The fact is a lot of people read them/listen to him and go "Yeah, he's right on the money" and this feeling supported in their view they go off on their own merry bigoted way.
However, in this particular instance, it's all fucking bollocks since it was clearly just a shit joke taken out of context.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:56, Reply)
They then proceeded to show the quotes out of context...
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:57, Reply)
everyone makes money out of being outraged as it garners attention.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:58, Reply)
the irony is that this row is distracting fromm their real issues around pay and pensions.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:59, Reply)
The response should have been "He's a cunt, let's move the debate on."
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:01, Reply)
if you're dumb enough to be offended by what someone who is renowned for sarcastic arrogance says, switch off the tv and have a look at your life. and real life.
urgh!
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:11, Reply)
Oh, apparently it's a Mr Terry Pot, I'll find out what he wants.
Hmmmm, I've had to hang up on him, he started off by implying you should be boiling water, and then he started hurling all this racist abuse.
Don't know what that was all about.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:15, Reply)
you socially insecure boring little oik.
*insert massive fake laugh to cover insecurities HERE*
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:35, Reply)
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:35, Reply)
it makes it look like this:
I DON'T CARE!
(HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA is everyone thinking i fit in now? are they? does it HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH look as if people like me? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA)
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:37, Reply)
you'd think they would just let it go and say, "look, Clarkson thinks it's a good thing, therefore anyone with a modicum of intelligence ought to be questioning what's wrong with it"
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:02, Reply)
There have been 20,000 complaints. Of which 75% are from people who haven't even fucking seen it.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:59, Reply)
but this one was so fucking obviously a joke that it's embarassing.
Daily Mail writers ARE counts, though. Clarkson is an amateur compared to them.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 11:58, Reply)
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:02, Reply)
They were discussing the Clarkson thing. There were 2 guests - 1 from an anti-censorship group, another from the GMB union (I think).
Charlie Nice-But-Dim had the union guy on the ropes with the 'he was quite clearly just kidding, have a fucking word with yourself' argument, and the best the union guy could come up with was 'this was not funny because some strikers actually did get shot. In Guatemala. Once'.
I actually howled with laughter. At BBC Breakfast. I couldn't believe it. What a twat. He totally dimished the genuine argument that the strikers have, by being a complete tool.
All aboard the Offended Bus. Toot toot.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:36, Reply)
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:42, Reply)
So stop being a colossal fud, Alan.
(, Fri 2 Dec 2011, 12:47, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread