Damn you,
I'll just sit here replying to emails for the next few hours.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:05, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

So anyone got a contained scalable process for leechate purification I can borrow?

(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:06, Reply)

Yes thanks.
Several.
(Bear Pookie The Frankly Challenged. Halloween is coming to town., Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:09, Reply)

Cool, know a remote way of guessing methane saturation at depth?

(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:16, Reply)

Doesn't everyone?
YOU ARE SO STUPID SOMETIMES.
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:17, Reply)

i think he's telling you
he wants to dutch oven you
( rachelswipe with a fork, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:19, Reply)

Looks like you can do it with lasers.
Awesome.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:23, Reply)

I've got a beer.
Is that a fuck off enough?
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:10, Reply)

I was thinking something
like using the crushed glass and pebbles reclaimed from the landfill as a filtration system, then just keep pumping it through until it's decent enough for reed beds.

I don't know what the evaporation rates would be though. It's all very confusing.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:13, Reply)

What are you trying to remove from the leachate?

( Bazongaloid, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:45, Reply)

URANIUM 235

( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:47, Reply)

Enough for it to be pumped out into a river ideally.
But generally enough of the toxins that it won't kill aerobic bacteria.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 15:48, Reply)

The major problem with landfill leachates are heavy metals.
You need to adsorb them onto fines, but then you still have the problem of how to prevent that escaping again as soon as you put that shit back into a landfill. And you also want to avoid creating monoliths so just sticking the whole lot in a massive cement block doesn't work too well.
( Bazongaloid, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:01, Reply)

What you want is graphene
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120126100639.htm
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:06, Reply)

I actually read about that today, it would be perfect.
But not cheap enough or have a high enough throughput.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:11, Reply)

Does simple evaporation concentrate the heavy metals?

(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:09, Reply)

It would do, but it would also lead to any volatiles being evaporated off with the water vapour.
There is an entire industry centred around the treatment of landfill leachate. You aren't the first to have tried this.
( Bazongaloid, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:11, Reply)

Yep, I've seen,
from the looks of it no one's got it quite right yet.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:18, Reply)

But with your extensive knowledge of spreadsheets, you're the man to come up with the solution?

( Bazongaloid, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:20, Reply)

Warning. The above post contains 82% ZING and should not be approached without appropriate safety goggles.

( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:23, Reply)

eyethangyou.

( Bazongaloid, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:28, Reply)

I enjoy thinking about things, and trying to solve problems.
The end result is secondary to the process. Think of it as a form of mental masturbation, I don't see any problem with it.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:32, Reply)

I wasn't trying to be mean, I think it's good that you're thinking about it
It's quite an interesting topic. A lot of the leachate is just recirculated within the landfill to keep the temperature down.
( Bazongaloid, Fri 27 Jan 2012, 16:40, Reply)