
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18453372
Agree? Disagree? Personally, I'm not that bothered, but the sabre wrattling occurs on a regular basis.
I've been to a nearby lump of rock, the Ascension Island, and they're crap. I'd imagine the Falklands are about as bad.
Alt, is it too early to enquire about lunch? I'm rather hungry here.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 9:54, 119 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18454262
(a much better link).
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 9:58, Reply)

Or Diego Maradona's head on a spike
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:01, Reply)

( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:12, Reply)

An untapped resource just waddling around.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:16, Reply)

www.imdb.com/title/tt0428803/
Although I couldn't eat a full one.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:21, Reply)

As long as the people on those islands want to be part of the UK, it's the UK's duty to ensure that they remain so. I don't care how many third world daygo countries that pisses off. There's absolutely no danger they'll be invaded again.
I am the voice of Imperialism.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:19, Reply)

and say the same thing. I just want the oil!
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:21, Reply)

They have never belonged to Argentina. Their entire argument rests on the islands being closer to them than us and that they once belonged to Spain some three hundred years ago.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:23, Reply)

Just because an island is near to your country, it doesn't make it yours.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:25, Reply)

Oil be doing this, and oil be doing that.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:27, Reply)

One of the lads finally managed to take a photo of the mental woman who walks round wearing some kind of matching headgear/jacket combo
Her hat has some kind of massive plastic wings!

( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:20, Reply)

it just looks like someone wearing a hat to me, I must be missing something
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:34, Reply)

It looks weird
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:38, Reply)

In terms of kooky attention seeking she'd score a solid 0/10
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:43, Reply)

Never mind, move on
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:44, Reply)

its only about half way there.
The islands are ours, and the inhabitants want to be. End of argument.
Mind you, if it wasn't for the First Sea Lord happening to be in Downing Street when it all kicked off we'd have given them up in '82.
"If we don't act, Prime Minister, we will be living in a country who's word counts for little in the world".
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:36, Reply)

was willing to talk about it in '82, right up until Argentina decided force was the way to go.
The US, apparently, didn't think we were militarily capable of mounting a response.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:39, Reply)

about how they used a 1950s plane on the longest bombing raid in history (at the time). Pretty amazing stuff.
Apparently cos we withdrew HMS Endurance Argentina thought we weren't serious about the Falklands any more, and the military government needed a success to divert attention from the shit going on in their own country.
Sound familiar?
Those who don't learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it, etc
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:49, Reply)

and we couldn't afford a replacement.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:52, Reply)

1,700 man permanent garrison, an airfield with three fighters, three RN frigates/destroyers and a nuclear sub in the area. The Argentines, meanwhile, still have the same planes they had in '82.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:59, Reply)

we would not be able to retake them as we have no sodding aircraft carriers left - or planes to put on them.
'Experts' reckon the only possible way for the Argies to take the islands would be through a special forces attack on RAF Mount Pleasant.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:08, Reply)

Not that she carries a great deal of airpower now all the Harriers are gone.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:14, Reply)

but an invasion without air cover would be a disaster.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:17, Reply)

but I suspect the Harriers could be recommissioned if necessary. The point I was making is that we have a ship capable of operating as a strike carrier. But yeah, the lack of planes is something of a handicap.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:26, Reply)

I like jigsaw puzzles
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:30, Reply)

Re the nearbyness. I was under the impression it was nearer.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:41, Reply)

Our bombers only had the range to get to Moscow at the time. The Falklands are a fuck of a long way away.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:45, Reply)

( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:48, Reply)

I propose that David Cameron and Cristina Fernández have a live televised fight to the death, winner takes all.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:45, Reply)

Although I had to Google who she was. Apparently Thatcher, the fucking mentalist, was prepared to go nuclear, if France didn't give us the override codes for the Argentinian missiles they'd bought off them.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:52, Reply)

Not nuclear to the Falklands, nuclear to Argentina. She was prepared to nuke their capital. Barking old shit.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:58, Reply)

One of the main reasons we won was our nuclear attack subs, which kept the enemy navy in harbour.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:59, Reply)

The 'nuclear' refers to nuclear-powered rather than nuclear weapons-carrying.
The Polaris boats would have been kept well away from the area, although they could have hit Argentina from pretty much anywhere on the planet.
I suspect the nuclear option was just a hypothetical exercise in case things went tits-up. I'd be amazed if the mad old bag would have seriously considered it.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:15, Reply)

Read the fucking post.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:21, Reply)

you used it as an exercise in showing off that you know the difference between the propulsion system of a submarine and what comes out the top.
Christ have you never read commando
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:25, Reply)

Presumably English is your second language.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:31, Reply)

( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:33, Reply)

If you can't understand that then I recommend that you DYAAKY.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:35, Reply)

( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:38, Reply)

Perhaps you were dropped on your head as a child.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:41, Reply)

the subs were nuclear powered but armed only with normal torpedoes.
Apparently the Argentines were more worried about a conventional bombing of their capital by Vulcans than any nuclear option.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:22, Reply)

They should be handed back. Of course the inhabitants don't want that, but if they love Britain so much why don't they go live there?
As a wise man once said, there can never really be justice for stolen land.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:53, Reply)

Perhaps the Aztecs or whatever should put in a claim.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 10:55, Reply)

when did The Falklands ever belong to Argentina or were inhabited by Argentinians.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:00, Reply)

By the time we settled them in 1833, they had been empty for years. The Argentinians have never had people living there. When we settled them, Argentina wasn't even a country yet.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:05, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Falklands.permanence.png
Spain gave all its south american colonies to the newly formed Argentina, so the spanish occupation is part of the argentine claim.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:11, Reply)

it shows that there's a period of non-ownership between Argentina and the UK's possession. Although it's true that I was incorrect in stating Argentina wasn't a country at the time.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:16, Reply)

for less than a year and a british warship turned up and told them to fuck off.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:19, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute
Thats why neither country will ever take it to court or to a UN judgment, because neither the Argies or us are sure who will win.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:21, Reply)

so technically, penguins
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:25, Reply)

apart from France, who don't count. But probably why Kroney is so upset about the whole thing.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:19, Reply)

Spain gave all their lands to Argentina.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:22, Reply)

I was in some shit club and they played 'Fuck da Police.' There were cunts around me singing along.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:33, Reply)

They call the police and I don't get to fuck them or anyone else.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:41, Reply)

Whatever the inhabitants want, let them have it.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:12, Reply)

The sun has come out! the sun has come out! still windy as a motherfucker though. Might do some painting.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:15, Reply)

hmmmm, you might have a point, my fine detail brushes are upstairs. fml.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:22, Reply)

Duh.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:27, Reply)

( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:33, Reply)

if you're going to break down outside the houses or parliament and then 'go sightsighting' your a prick and you need more than just your boot being blown off
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:46, Reply)

I love that story.
"A controlled explosion took place...the incident was subsequently deemed as unsuspicious."
Masterful understatement, there.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:32, Reply)

That would have been harsh.
But why the fuck did he abandon it if the AA were on their way? I thought they usually responded within an hour? It's hardly enough time to go to the fucking zoo.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:39, Reply)

it doesn't make it exempt from parking laws, you know.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:53, Reply)

it could have been a bomb, given its location, and it was parked illegally and abandoned, despite the shitty handwritten note that most likely blew away
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:55, Reply)

( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 11:26, Reply)

History is written by the winners.
( , Fri 15 Jun 2012, 12:07, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »