
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Alt: cognac, beer, wine, massive drugs, crisps*. I'd have a great fortnight before I croaked.
* not really, crisps are shit
Thought for the day: in Islam it is considered arrogant and disrespectful to create images of people and animals of any kind - let alone of God or 'the prophet'. With this in mind is it not a little odd that it is deemed perfectly OK to actually name your son after Mohamed, as millions of imaginative Muslim parents do? So likening your progeny to their holiest prophet = fine, drawing a picture of a mangy dog = BURN HIM!!!!
FFS what is wrong with these cunts?
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:16, 3 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

which I don't really understand. Does an Imam bless every bean thats roasted/ground?
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:20, Reply)

NOT WITH A SPOON! ! ! !!111! azzz!
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:21, Reply)

Biscuits = 79p
Same biscuits some shady cunt has mumbled some gibberish over = £1.50
Fucking mugs deserve all they get.
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:22, Reply)

The Green Flag over Old Trafford?
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:31, Reply)

a bit of racism and generalisation in the morning, smells like... victory
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:21, Reply)

Last time I checked Islam isn't a race. If it was it would come last, as it stopped to pray half way round the track.
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:23, Reply)

i'm sure there are many more temperate muslims out there than most of us will ever get to see.
the only time i ever saw a muslim getting upset over a drawing was when that danish guy drew mohammed with a bomb on his head, and if someone in the middle east had done something similar in the middle east with a picture of jesus bombing afghan villages for oil, the church in this country would be just as pissed off, although it would probably only be the fundamentalists in the states burning flags and effigies, we brits are too ncie for all that
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:26, Reply)

I can tell you now that human and animal representation is forbidden in the vast, vast majority of the Islamic world and has been since the C16th - and it's been getting more rabid since the end of the Ottoman Empire who were quite reasonable on such matters. Even their plant motifs are generally not based on real, identifiable plants for the same reason.
The only main exception still in evidence today is the tradition of wall painting found in Egypt along the main Hajj routes, where they do some (frankly shit) murals showing pilgims. Even there, their spasticated rules mean that they *deliberately* miss out shading, shadows etc so that they don't think they are trying to copy God. The end result is that perfectly decent artists deliberately do paintings that look like they were done by children.
Hope this helps x
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:32, Reply)

What is this Mohammed?
*space in book where dog should be*
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:36, Reply)

they know that they're hopelessly outgunned and outclassed by a more advanced civilisation, and their posturing is purely to big themselves up in front of their mates?
i had to go away for a bit as i was busy :(
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 10:01, Reply)

And the families of the people blown to pieces in terror attacks all over the world, all the fucking time.
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 10:08, Reply)

if we don't want to get our fingers burnt we leave them the fuck alone to sort their own shit out
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 10:20, Reply)

following some perceived slight by an Arab cartoonist is perhaps the most laughable suggestion you have ever made.
The two outlooks are utterly and completely opposed to each other. The Church in this country has moved on a little since the Middle Ages.
EDIT they are also stupid pricks though
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:37, Reply)

He kick their fucking cocks off
( , Tue 19 Jun 2012, 9:38, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread