
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

By allowing UN weapons inspections?
I thought that both of these things happened.
But also, Saddam Hussein wasn't particularly known for his rational behaviour.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 10:48, 2 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

They could have paid the War reparations to Quwait the UN told them to, sign a non agression pact with their neighbours, visibly reduce military spending and stop imprisioning so many of their own people.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 10:52, Reply)

But Hans Blix was pulled out of Iraq so that the Allies could invade.
Also, regime change is not a legal reason to start a war.
As you said up there though, history might have been kinder if they had carried it out more effectively. Winning the war itself was always going to be easy. It is mind boggling that no one considered the consequences.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 10:58, Reply)

soon as he wasn't he suddenly became the enemy. See also Gaddafi, Idi Amin,etc. Plus the ones that go the other way.
One man's terrorist is someone else's freedom fighter.
If it's not about oil, but democracy, why haven't we invaded Zimbabwe?
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 10:53, Reply)

Politics is the art of the possible, especially so in international politics. If everyone didn't trade, meet or acknowledge the existance of any countrys rulers that we didn't agree with then the world would descend into another world war pretty quickly. Plus we need shit from them and they need stuff from us.
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 10:58, Reply)

is the art of saying "nice doggie" whilst searching for a brick.
Forget who said that, but it sums it up nicely!
( , Wed 11 Jul 2012, 11:01, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread