
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

Several unappealing pictures of peoples babies in various poses designed to make the observer coo. Result invariably makes the subject look like a stroke victim.
A picture of a curry. I think it was a curry, anyway. Could have been a stroganoff. Either way, they were awfully proud of it considering it looked like cat vomit.
"Looking 4ward to a luvly healthy roast din din Xxx"
Various invitations to shit web browser games.
Constant spam by one person consisting of saccharine, banal "motivational" pictures, usually involving a dog of some sort.
ONE entry in which somebody is having some sort of fucking life outside children, dogs and food.
I swear to God, if it wasn't for George Takei with all his gay pride posts, I'd never have anything to read at all. I could remove them all and save myself some rage but occasionally they do post updates about themselves that I do find interesting, they are my friends after all. Besides, I like being angry. Are you friends with shit people?
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 17:03, 113 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

Fucking hell are they over-played.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 17:13, Reply)

Have you made a million from it yet?
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:01, Reply)

( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 17:43, Reply)

You should have gone to the reggae bbq in the 3 legged mare. I know how much you like reggae.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 17:33, Reply)

You should have gone to Hijacked, I know how much you love techno.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 17:37, Reply)

Can't risk offending them now, who knows when I might need them to hide me from the Law?
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:37, Reply)

He even said "Oh dear, I cocked that up", when he lost a dice game.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:23, Reply)

He got to that gambling guy, who said "If you roll a bigger dice than me, I'll give you 8888, if I get higher, then I get it for 4444".
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:37, Reply)

paint dots on each face and roll that fucker. Give me my 8888, bitch.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:39, Reply)

at market values.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:46, Reply)

I'm going to take him literally and win on the technicality.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:47, Reply)

I am not anal enough to insist on the use of "die" given how archaic it is.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:53, Reply)

( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:50, Reply)

And not in any deviant sexual way, as might be insinuated in that first sentence.
We couldn't agree on a price so we flipped a coin, and I won. Got that box of shit for two pounds off.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:43, Reply)

Got it for four quid. No messing.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:08, Reply)

No wonder he's such an aggressive, humourless prick. His band are supremely shit.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:33, Reply)

You know the type, easily angered, loves 'metal', takes B3ta far too seriously.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:39, Reply)

Srsly, they sound like a 16 year old's Metallica tribute.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:42, Reply)

www.myspace.com/aconflicttocure
Shock & Awe is particularly embarrassing.
Enjoy.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:47, Reply)

And quite a few autists.
There is one woman I used to work with who had one of those automatic weekly update things through her pregnancy that told me how big her baby was and what stage of development it was at. She also does messages to her little boy about school achievements. Dude, he's four. He's not reading facebook. And I don't care.
Anyway, if you were friends with more b3tans on fb, you'd have a lot more updates about fun stuff. so there.
In other news, I had a sleep this afternoon and got overheated and now I feel sick. Ugh.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:41, Reply)

On the one hand it's her first kid so she's goign to be a bit stupid over it; on the other hand, I kind of want to attack her with a crowbar.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:43, Reply)

I wonder if anyone has made a facebook scouts app? You could totally social that system up.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:44, Reply)

( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:42, Reply)

A big bonus over the first film is that Arnold Schwarzenegger is in T2, but his wang isn't.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:44, Reply)

Terminator is a classic. A serious and stylish film.
T2 was just a big bag of bollocks.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:47, Reply)

Yes, The Terminator is the better film. It's darker, better written, fewer plot holes and the balance between the near-invicible machine and the protagonists is perfect. T2 has gaping plot holes and the more-invicible-than-the-other-near-invincible-Terminator Terminator is a bit bent. Plus the other films are progressively worse.
However, I watch and enjoy them all because raaargh robots! Crash! Boom! Dakkadakkadakka.
Also, 100% less dong.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:52, Reply)

I really cannot stress enough how much I don't need to see Arnie's penis, however.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:54, Reply)

I will certainly look out for it next time I watch The Terminator.
How's your weekend going?
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 18:58, Reply)

I love it, you get to see some posh toffs completely fuck up centuries worth of inheritance for an completely over prividlidged lifestyle.
I don't see how any just two people can live in an 18 bedroom house. I don't see why they would want too eaither.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:10, Reply)

The aristocracy generally has no money, what with inheritance tax and what have you, so they live off the fact that they own an estate.
Unless they were smart like the Longleat family, and did something to earn a living from their home.
You know what my dream house is? Two staircases (or even more), scullery / pantry, and a swimming pool. *keeps fingers crossed for a lottery win*
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:13, Reply)

THE PIER!
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:15, Reply)

So that was nice.
What have you done this weekend?
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:25, Reply)

which is going to help with my skillset.
Looked for jobs.
Cried.
Bought chocolate.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:27, Reply)

I'm going to have to bite the bullet and get my arse to Bristol.
It's closer than Mars, I suppose.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:34, Reply)

www.jobsite.co.uk/job/field-based-supervisor-943248674?src=search
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:40, Reply)

but there are some interesting jobs in bristol at the moment. I just have to resign myself to never seeing my boys.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:44, Reply)

How long does it take you to get into bristol?
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 20:06, Reply)

Inheritance tax is fucking awful, and the only people who seem to pay it are those who aren't quite rich enough to get away with it.
* eg, it has to be in the same property, can't be like outside your flat but in the same building, if you know what I mean.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:17, Reply)

Plus with financial planning it's not too difficult to mitigate against it.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:20, Reply)

Mitigating against it, as easy or hard as it is, is exactly whats wrong with it. The fact that people feel the need to circumvent it, and can do so, shows that its unfair. In the same way nobody should go poor because they're sick; no family should go poor due to death. Poor is relative here. People who work hard all their lives, do the right thing and save, end up giving a big load of it into the goverment when they've already been paying taxes all their lives anyway.
* www.londonpropertywatch.co.uk/avg_prices.html
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:28, Reply)

People should pay taxes, but within the rules. The rules are that trusts etc can take money out of the estate, and if you have an estate worth over £325000 then you can afford the £500 to go and see an IFA.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:31, Reply)

Totally agree, I doubt you'd find anyone with those sorts of assets who _doesn't_ see an IFA; they'd be stupid, like not getting insurance. But my point is, well, there are two. The first one is that it feels like the goverment are proftering on greif... I see it as, if you're in that position, you've paid tax all your life, you've done 'your bit' - and more soo. It's like the goverment values the more affluent as a financial gain if dead - the oppersite to the principles on which the NHS was founded.
And my second point is, and this goes ditto for the banking and tax evaision; the rule should be clear, equal and concise for everyone - no matter what your knowledge of the law is.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:40, Reply)

Both in cash terms and in percentage of income terms. IHT is a part of this, it was originally only levied on the largest estates but the rate hasn't risen at the same pace as house price inflation so it affects more people now.
Taxing the dead on their estate isn't tasteless or in opposition to social principles at all- it's a way of gathering tax receipts when large amounts of cash are released.
It's everyone's responsibility to pay tax, but nobody should have to pay any more than they legally have to. David Cameron criticising anyone for tax evasion is rich- the Government make laws, including tax laws, so if they wanted to, they could hire the country's best tax lawyers and accountants and make the income tax laws watertight, or vastly increase the PAYE requirement but choose not to.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:45, Reply)

It just seems there is a spot somewhere, where it's worth pissing it up the wall rather than passing it down.
I'm only half (ok, 2/3) saying inheritance tax, as a principle is wrong, it's more that my feelings about how they go about doing it is. I think my opinion (and it is that; just an opinion, purly based on self interest without research) would change if there was an even ground for everyone, and not based on the knowledge of a consultant.
Totally agree that Camron is pretty rich (pun unintentional) in berating people for finding loop holes whilst doing nothing to adjust them. Although I suppose, given the demographic of parliment, it isn't in their self interests to close them.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 20:00, Reply)

For couples, put the house in joint names and take out a life insurance policy which will cover the IHT liability. If you're reasonably sure that there will be a 50 grand tax bill, then pay the £30 or so a month premium for a 50K life policy. That way, at death there will be the money to pay the tax bill and not have to sell the house. Plus, there's no way that the insurance premiums will have amounted to anything approaching the 50K payout.
It's not difficult and not that expensive.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 20:06, Reply)

That paying tax on income that has already been tax isn't cricket.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 20:21, Reply)

And your income gets taxed three times anyway.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 20:24, Reply)

where they had a staircase in the living room and another one in the kitchen. Also, having grown up in army houses, which are very identikit square boxes, I love houses with corners and split levels and odd shaped rooms.
My brother in law lives in a house like that. I love it.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:21, Reply)

( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:30, Reply)

I'd sale the fucking lot of it, buy a nice proper luxoury house in hampstead, and let the rest of the investments lead me into a lifestyle of pure luxoury for myself and my future generations to come.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:22, Reply)

there might be an obligation to keep it on. Of course, inheritance tax means each subsequent generation has 50% less money for the upkeep of the estate, to the extent that the current lot of toffs can barely afford to heat one wing.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:24, Reply)

IHT is 40% on the value of the estate over £325,000. And it's easy to use trusts to avoid it. Most wealthy people pay IFAs to arrange things so that they avoid IHT.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:27, Reply)

My friend Matt posts Scripture every day and constantly posts photos of him and teenage boys from his church, it's incredibly disturbing
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:34, Reply)

And suggest he deletes his account before killing himself.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 19:38, Reply)

I will have no internet for a couple of weeks so don't miss me too much.
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 20:31, Reply)

Moving house jeff. Hopefully it won't be too long but it always takes a while. Good weekend?
( , Sun 15 Jul 2012, 20:38, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »