That's the one.
It's so obviously bullshit and totally unenforceable. WHY ARE PEOPLE SO FUCKING RETARDED!?

It's like a friend of my wifes was round a while ago and we were talking about teh whole banking crisis and she'd read a book (i.e. fiction) where someone deliberately fucked up a banking system and this provided her with enough evidence to be happy that this whole situation was deliberately done by someone "on the inside".

I did try pointing out that it was more likely caused by greed and total incompetence, but she wouldn't have it.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:27, 2 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

This is why referendums and even democracy should be banned
people are too stupid to think for themselves
( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:29, Reply)

Someonewas trying to tell me that television channels needed your permission to use a persons image if caught on film in public
which would explain why they blur all the faces of the crowd at football games
( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:32, Reply)

I'm pretty sure they do
but they do it be inferred consent, if you don't tell them you don't want your image used, then they can use your image. And if you don't want it used, they won't let you in as a condition of entry will be the right by them to use your image.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:34, Reply)

how about live broadcasts from a highstreet?
public place, no entry criteria.

I do like it when there is a story on fat people and they film loads of fat people from the tits down so as not to offened them.
( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:37, Reply)

I'm pretty sure they don't.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:45, Reply)

That would make the paparazzi's job a bit more difficult

( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:37, Reply)

Public interest innit

( Bazongaloid, Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:41, Reply)