b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1835917 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Quite correct - I was wrong
I am pleased that despite your unfortunate genital accessory malfunction you are able to uphold correct standards of syntax.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:18, 1 reply, 13 years ago)
If we can't defend our language from childish errors then how are we going to defend our shores from the kikes and the fuzzywuzzies?

(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:26, Reply)
Despite that momentary lapse, I am ready
We will march forward with pikes, pitchforks, pointy things and other sharp stuff beginning with P in our valiant effort to repel the hoards I've read about in discarded papers.

My question is - are YOU ready? You've got a bit of Chinese plastic inextricably mangled about your parts. When we boldly march forward you will be striking out like a spastic Tiller girl trying to ride a BMX as the plastic digs deeper.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:39, Reply)
"hordes"
And the object with which I am currently in an exotic entanglement is made entirely from brass and walnut.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:41, Reply)
David Dickinson?

(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:46, Reply)
Oh god.
Now I've got an image of his nut-brown sphincter gnawing on my cock like a gulping frog. I don't think I'll ever be flaccid again.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:49, Reply)
He's austentatiously adjusting his glasses to get a better look at the penetration.
Crikey.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:52, Reply)
Ostentationally
I hate being pulled up on grammar - got you.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:57, Reply)
In the manner of a Jane Austen character.
And "Ostentationally" isn't a word at all.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:00, Reply)
I'll give you that.
I'm not sure that my construction is correct either but the verb is ostentatious.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:03, Reply)
erm...
it's "ostentatiously", isn't it?
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:01, Reply)
Yeah, ok, ok
It doesn't begin with "Au" though.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:05, Reply)
You are a Bonobo monkey AICMFP

(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:53, Reply)
I don't know which part of this is more offensive
the fact that you think my balls are that small or the fact that you don't know that a Bonobo isn't a monkey.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:55, Reply)
DFKDFC
on both counts
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:58, Reply)
Can you date it? Roughly?
Could you try and pry it away from your knob enough to see if it's hallmarked?

I think this could make a lot of money at auction, if only it could be detached from the pervert.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:46, Reply)
1992.
That's not particularly rough. That's when I bought it. I'm pretty sure it was new at the time although it's not the sort of thing that shows its age. Until you start slamming it in the door of a ford transit minibus.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:50, Reply)
Not a good age
It's damaged and the attached pervert is badly tainted.

I'll give you scrap value for a transit with a dented door.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:54, Reply)
I don't think the driver will be too happy if I sell his cab.

(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:56, Reply)
Tell him it's TD - he'll know my money's good

(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:00, Reply)
More like
"the attached taint is badly perverted"
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 19:56, Reply)
It's got a bolt through it and a tattoo of a stylised owl.
I think that's pretty nicely perverted.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:02, Reply)
Oh, a Chippendale tawny cock ring?
They're rare you know, only 6 were made and Prince Philip has 3 of them.
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:06, Reply)
A van with a tattoo of an owl on the door!
Whatever next?
(, Sun 20 Jan 2013, 20:08, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1