
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Although, I do remember a valentines in of the first restaurants I worked in, a marriage proposal going south, as he got down on one knee, she burst in to tears and then told him, loud enough for us to hear, that she was sleeping with a colleague and didn't love him in anymore. Poor guy looked like he'd been pushed in a vat of sheep dip.
Alt; I quite like an ironed shirt, but am well aware I could live without.
Altalt: sorry about the dungeon joke cavy.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 9:53, 3 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

Go to resturants, order the lobster and fois gras, propose to your mate, get them to say 'no' then burst out, then chase after them..... suddenly KAPLOWIE, free meal.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 9:57, Reply)

it's not technically theft if you decide to do a runner after eating - no intention to permanently deprive.
but good luck proving that one in court.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 9:59, Reply)

on the grounds you haven't stolen anything. What with it being "beforehand"
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:02, Reply)

As I learned after I nicked that car.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:04, Reply)

some frozen bread rolls that get lobbed back into the freezer every night
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:18, Reply)

possibly because most good restauarants in Edinburgh aren't run by robbing savages stuck in the 1980s?
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:19, Reply)

I always thought it was bollocks trotted out by idiots.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:03, Reply)

TWOC doesn't. That's the difference. It's a fucking narrow one.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:06, Reply)

on the grounds that it wasn't up to scratch. But, you'd have to front it, you couldn't actually just run.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:07, Reply)

( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:10, Reply)

deciding to steal a free meal
and refusing to pay for a meal on the grounds that you weren't happy with it. and yeah, empty plates are not good evidence for the latter!
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:14, Reply)

The internet told me this, so it must be true:
You don’t always have to pay the bill
If you do not like making a fuss, you can always pay ‘under protest’ and write on the back of the bill – or your credit card slip - that you are doing so. Make sure you take a copy too. This gives you the chance of claiming against the restaurant at a later date. However, if you’re talking about something like £25 for two, it’s probably not going to be worth the hassle – or accepted by the small claims court.
Another option is to offer to pay a sum you consider acceptable and give your full name and address (with proof of identity), stating why you are not paying the rest. Restaurants often wrongly believe customers have to pay for a meal whatever the circumstances.
This is not the case. As long as you have a genuine reason for not paying and you leave your name and address, you have not acted in any way dishonestly.
You have not committed an offence and even if the police are called they should not usually intervene unless it is to prevent a breach of the peace.
It is a criminal offence, though, to go into a restaurant and order a meal with the intention of not paying for it.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:09, Reply)

nobody is going to sue over a few quid.
the bottom line is, ordering a meal is a contract. the restaurant makes an "invitation to treat" on its menu. you then make an offer to purchase its goods at the menu price. the menu supplies the goods, and you give consideration for that by paying.
if the goods aren't satisfactory, you slug it out. but you can't eat them all and then argue they were shit!
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:15, Reply)

I once bought a 'club sandwich' that was 3 slices of plastic bread with a single slice of that packet roast beef between the two bread gaps, a packet of walkers crisps and a can of coke for £9. They forgot the horseraddish, butter and salad.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:24, Reply)

( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:25, Reply)

It's one thing to refuse to pay - quite another to get a refund
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:26, Reply)

The most spectacular being a curry house on the IoW with a £2000 bill for 3 yacht crews. They took 2.5 hours to produce the starters, another 1.5 for the mains and by the time the food turned up we were all too pissed to eat it. Wouldn't have been so much of an issue but the 24 of us were the only people in a restaurant with 100 or so seats, so clearly they should have been able to cope.
So we paid about £700 for the wine and refused to pay for the food, and in the end they had to accept that. Although I doubt we'd be welcome there again.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:14, Reply)

( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:19, Reply)

there'd still be a civil claim for failing to pay the bill in line with the oral contract for supply of food. and let's face it, you care about the civil and getting your money back much more!
it's a legal distinction but a pointless one, because if you stand up in court and say, "we only decided to run away AFTER we'd eaten, not before", who is going to believe you?
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:13, Reply)

You could have a ring and keep the recipt.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:03, Reply)

( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:06, Reply)

One of them came back a few minutes later as he'd forgotten his bag.
( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:06, Reply)

( , Thu 14 Feb 2013, 10:16, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread