
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

i.e. why do you get 8Gb, 16Gb and 32Gb but nothing in between, but with hard discs you get 250Gb or 350Gb or 500Gb or 1 Tb etc.?
Or, I dunno, talk about lunch.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:00, 97 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

More like RAM than a HDD?
I am fucking starving but I don't know what to have
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:02, Reply)

So in the 8gb one they're probably got 4x2gb chips, in the 16gb they've got 4x4gb chips etc. They keep the same number of chips and controllers cooling etc because it makes designing them easier.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:04, Reply)

Why normal HDD's don't necessarily go up in the same way is because they're based on spinning disks. You can either have more disks or "plates" in higher capacity drives or most likely a better head for reading/writing and each disk can write a byte of data in a smaller area. As this has more variables they tend to just do them in 50gb lots.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:13, Reply)

but I'm confused about the doubling up thing if you take it back to the very begining. Can I assume that they don't work from Bytes and go up, they just invented 1 Gb chips?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:15, Reply)

The SSD is a bastardisation of USB key tech, so imagine a bunch of USB keys all wired up with complicated mathmatics to make them work as a single drive.
It doubles because that structure is based on a bunch of seperate memory chips working together. It doesn't necessarily have to double, but in practice it does because it's the best way to get a range out quickly.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:19, Reply)

I'll never understand women.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:25, Reply)

And the fact Milton Keynes is the city of dreams.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:26, Reply)

1TB is still 1024GB
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:05, Reply)

It was the same with Megabytes, so you have 1Mg, then 2Mb then 4 then 8 then 16 then 32 the 64 so how did they get from that to Gigabytes but still using the same nice round numbers?
Oh wait, I get it "1Gb" is actually "1024Mb"? right? But no, that doesn't work Because once you're past 64Gb teh extra bit rounds it up, and that's not what happens.
And that's assuming you start from Mb, not just bytes.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:10, Reply)

Question swipe, do you wax or shave?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:15, Reply)

an itchy george michael is not a good look
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:26, Reply)

before ripping the hair off. And you're happy with showing your mimsy to a stranger?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:28, Reply)

Or is there another brand you advocate?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:24, Reply)

there are 1024 bytes in a kilobyte, 1024 kb in 1mb and 1024 mb in a gb.
When you think 1TB, you're thinking in base ten, which is why it doesn't seem to make sense that it's not 1000kb. Because they use 1GB, they've taken to using 500mb (rather than the more accurate 512) etc as well.
It's just ease of labelling, really.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:16, Reply)

1048576 bytes dosent matter, because you're defining a Mb as 1024Kb, not the number of bytes is containins.
So each layer has a kind of reset factor compared with the actual number of bits involved.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:19, Reply)

you actually only get about 29Gb of storage because the 29Gb is the actual number of bits available, not the number of "bytes"
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:20, Reply)

That's because the quoted size is the raw amount of user data in the flash chips which is less than the actual amount of data since flash chips contain additional non-user data to protect blocks and store status information but less than the amount that the user will see since the file system and operating system will add an overhead and oh god this is tedious but everbody else is talking semi-informed shite and the nerd in me couldn't quite resist I'll shut up now kthx.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:28, Reply)

all the careful trolling you carry out, and this you take seriously?
THIS?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:30, Reply)

It's a sore point. Like my penis.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:32, Reply)

but the amount you "lose" between the volume you see on the packet and what you get appears to be a bit proportional, so if it was just system storage surely that would be far less with a large chip rather than a small chip?
I'm genuinely curious, are you saying that the difference in bits between what we define as 1Gb and how many bits that would be if you started from 8 bits in 1 byte and had 1024Mb or whatever has nothing to do with the difference in perceived size?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:31, Reply)

Hard disk platters were always quoted in decimal (i.e. 1000 bytes to a kB etc) to make them seem slightly bigger until consumers got a trifle miffed. Flash memory wasn't really a consumer product until fairly recently so the numbers quoted were more "honest".
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:35, Reply)

I'm going to look at some tits instead.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:38, Reply)

actual, physical measurement and the logical aproximation it actually is. It's all very complicated.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:22, Reply)

you never get into that.
EVER.
fucking hell man, there are people here.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:30, Reply)

and the main difference between platters and flash chips is that the former were conventionally quoted in decimal and the latter have always been quoted in base 2.
But apart from that you're ... well ... largely wrong but I doubt anybody really cares.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:31, Reply)

b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1888552
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:32, Reply)

Not because "ooh startrek" but in a how people make up a language sort of way.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:36, Reply)

I was aware of base 2, but I went with using 8 as an example because that's what you'll actually see quoted, 8, 16, 32 etc. I'm always willing to be educated.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:34, Reply)

I've got some massively tedious datasheets you can read while you're pretending to watch Oliver! or whatever it is that your missus is imposing on you.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:36, Reply)

but I'll have a bloody good go.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:42, Reply)

For example One terrabyte is acutally 1024 gigabytes, not 1000.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:05, Reply)

i want to go to vital ingredient and get a hand-tossed salad but it's snowing so i might just have to hit up the staff canteen for an egg mayo and cheese bagel or something.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:07, Reply)

but not sticking on the pavements.
no idea about the northern provinces though.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:13, Reply)

Is there any other way of tossing a fucking salad? Have you southern woofters invented some kind of salad-tossing robot?
For fuck's sake.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:16, Reply)

instead of buying it in a box with what some other fucker thinks tastes good thrown in there
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:27, Reply)

i have zero food in my flat unless i am cooking specifically for people. my fridge is nothing but alcohol and evian.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:35, Reply)

Her lunch is really a wheelbarrow full of pasta & ten doughnuts.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:29, Reply)

Can you throw in breasts as an alt: please?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:09, Reply)

( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:13, Reply)

so this is a pretty fucking ungrateful response, in my book.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:13, Reply)

we should have a bring back the mentals day. workboresroger, edmund, bert...
also is there any other kind of sisterfucker?
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:35, Reply)

( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:21, Reply)

The last one was Nigella Lawson I believe.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:22, Reply)

Apparently he thought I'd care about elephants, or some shit.
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:24, Reply)

And why does your mum only have 3 orifices when there are 10 men waiting!!!???111
( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:50, Reply)

( , Mon 11 Mar 2013, 12:56, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »